ArticlePloS one2022
Use the right kidney contour as a landmark in adrenal vein sampling.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Success Rate of Adrenal Venous Sampling and the Location of Right Adrenal Vein Orifice: A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2026Article
- Utilizing the renal and vertebral contours as landmarks for right adrenal vein localization in primary aldosteronism: a retrospective analysis of 310 cases.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adrenal Vein Sampling (AVS) is the gold standard for categorizing primary aldosteronism (PA). However, catheterization of the right adrenal vein (RAV) is challenging due the small size and variable location. This study aims to explore the relationship between the RAV orifice and the right kidney contour (RKC) on fluoroscopy, thus evaluating the potential of use the RKC as an anatomic marker for localizing RAV. Imaging data of 107 PA patients with successful bilateral AVS were retrospectively analyzed. Based on the body mass index (BMI), all patients were divided into the Normal Group (BMI < 24 kg/m2), Overweight Group (24 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 28 kg/m2) and Obese Group (BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2). At the anterior view, the height level of RAV orifice was determined relative to vertebral bodies and disks. The distance from the RAV orifice to the upper edge of RKC was measured manually. The RAV orifice height level was mainly distributed from vertebral T11 to T12 (90.6%), and tended to be higher in patients with a larger BMI. The mean distance from the RAV orifice to the upper edge of RKC was 13.9±7.8mm, and had no difference among Normal group (n = 53, 14.1±8.2mm), Overweight group (n = 39, 13.7±8.0mm), and Obese group (n = 15, 13.9±5.5mm) (p = 0.981). Based on these findings, the RKC might be used as a landmark for localizing RAV on fluoroscopy, which is conductive to narrow down the exploration range and increase the success rate of RAV catheterization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.