Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36173985›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2022

Image quality of abdominal ultrasonography after esophagogastroduodenoscopy is preserved by using carbon dioxide insufflation: A non-inferiority test in the same subject.

Tsuyoshi Suda, Yukihiro Shirota, Hiroaki Takimoto, Yasunori Tsukada, Kensaku Takishita, Takahiro Nadamura, Masaki Miyazawa, Yuji Hodo, Tokio Wakabayashi

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tsuyoshi SudaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Saiseikai Kanazawa Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Yukihiro ShirotaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Saiseikai Kanazawa Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6561-4626
Hiroaki TakimotoMedical Examination Center, Saiseikai Kanazawa Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Yasunori TsukadaDepartment of Radiology, Saiseikai Kanazawa Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Kensaku TakishitaDepartment of Radiology, Saiseikai Kanazawa Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Takahiro NadamuraDepartment of Radiology, Saiseikai Kanazawa Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Masaki MiyazawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Saiseikai Kanazawa Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Yuji HodoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Saiseikai Kanazawa Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Tokio WakabayashiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Saiseikai Kanazawa Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Kanazawa Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because bowel gas deteriorates the image quality of abdominal ultrasonography (AUS), it is common to perform AUS prior to esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). This one-way order limits the availability of examination appointments. To evaluate whether EGD using insufflation of carbon dioxide (CO2), which is rapidly absorbed by the gastrointestinal mucosa, preserves the image quality of AUS performed subsequently, we designed a non-inferiority test in which each subject underwent AUS, EGD with CO2 insufflation, and a second AUS, in that order. All saved AUS moving images were randomized and imaging quality was evaluated at 16 organs using a four-point Likert-like scale that divides the depiction rate by 25%. Sample size was calculated to be 26 using the following: non-inferiority margin of -0.40 corresponding to depiction rate of -10%, difference of means of 0.40, common standard deviation of 1.25, power of 90%, and 1-sided α-level of 0.025. We enrolled 30 subjects. The mean and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the image quality score of all 16 organs at pre- and post-EGD AUS in the 30 subjects were 3.54 [3.48-3.60] and 3.46 [3.39-3.52], respectively. The difference in the means was 0.08 of the scores, corresponding to a 2% depiction rate. The effect size was 0.172. The image quality of post-EGD AUS was not inferior, as demonstrated by the 97.5% CI of the difference, which did not cross the non-inferiority margin of -0.40. In conclusion, the use of CO2 for insufflation in EGD does not cause much deterioration in the image quality of AUS performed subsequently. Therefore, it is permissible to perform EGD prior to AUS, which is expected to improve the efficiency of examination setup.

Indexed as

InsufflationAbdomenCarbon DioxideEndoscopy, Digestive SystemHumansUltrasonographyCarbon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID36173985
PMCPMC9521841
OpenAlexW4297991940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.