Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36173972›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

A novel assessment method for COVID-19 humoral immunity duration using serial measurements in naturally infected and vaccinated subjects.

Jasper de Boer, Ursula Saade, Elodie Granjon, Sophie Trouillet-Assant, Carla Saade, Hans Pottel, Maan Zrein, Covid ser study group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04341142 (Assessment of Serological Techniques for Screening Patients Regarding COVID-19-COVID-SER), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04341142 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Assessment of Serological Techniques for Screening Patients Regarding COVID-19-COVID-SER

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospices Civils de LyonRan2020 to 2026Enrolled550ConditionsCoV2 Positive CaregiversArmsSerological tests will be applied on patients blood sampling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jasper de BoerDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven Campus Kulak, Kortrijk, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1093-7409
Ursula SaadeR&D Department, InfYnity Biomarkers, Lyon, France.
Elodie GranjonR&D Department, InfYnity Biomarkers, Lyon, France.
Sophie Trouillet-AssantVirology Laboratory, Institute of Infectious Agents, Laboratory associated with the National Reference Centre for Respiratory Viruses, Civils Hospices of Lyon, Lyon, France.
Carla SaadeVirology Laboratory, Institute of Infectious Agents, Laboratory associated with the National Reference Centre for Respiratory Viruses, Civils Hospices of Lyon, Lyon, France.
Hans PottelDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven Campus Kulak, Kortrijk, Belgium.
Maan ZreinR&D Department, InfYnity Biomarkers, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3301-4252
Covid ser study group
Hospices Civils de Lyon · FRKU Leuven · BEUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCollecting information on sustainability of immune responses after infection or vaccination is crucial to inform medical decision-making and vaccination strategies. Data on how long-lasting antibodies against SARS-COV-2 could provide a humoral and protective immunity and prevent reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 or its variants is particularly valuable. This study presents a novel method to quantitatively measure and monitor the diversity of SARS-CoV-2 specific antibody profiles over time.

methodsSerum samples from two groups were used in this study: Samples from 20 naturally infected subjects (followed for up to 1 year) and samples from 83 subjects vaccinated with one or two doses of the Pfizer BioNtech vaccine (BNT162b2/BNT162b2) (followed for up to 6 months). The Multi-SARS-CoV-2 assay, a multiparameter serology test developed for the serological confirmation of past-infections, was used to determine the reactivity of six different SARS-CoV-2 antigens. For each subject sample, 3 dilutions (1/50, 1/400 and 1/3200) were defined as an optimal set over the six antigens and their respective linear ranges. This allowed accurate quantification of the corresponding six antibodies. Nonlinear mixed-effects modelling was applied to convert intensity readings from 3 determined dilutions to a single quantification value for each antibody.

resultsMedian half-life for the 20 naturally infected vs 74 vaccinated subjects (two doses) was 120 vs 50 days for RBD, 127 vs 53 days for S1 and 187 vs 86 days for S2 antibodies respectively.

conclusionThe newly proposed method, based on a series of a limited number of dilutions, can convert a conventional qualitative assay into a quantitative assay. This conversion helps define the sustainability of specific immune responses against each relevant viral antigen and can help in defining the protection characteristics after an infection or a vaccination.

Indexed as

COVID-19Immunity, HumoralAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralBNT162 VaccineHumansSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralBNT162 Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID36173972
PMCPMC9521896
OpenAlexW4297991628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.