Observational studyPloS one2022
Utility of periodic medical questionnaires and examinations for immune-related adverse event screening: A prospective observational study.
Observational study in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) specific to the immunity-boosting activity of the drugs and may necessitate discontinuation of treatment depending on their severity. IrAEs may be difficult to diagnose in their early stages as they can occur in any organ. The present, prospective, observational study is the first to attempt to assess the utility of periodic medical questionnaires and laboratory, radiological, and physiological examinations in diagnosing irAEs.
methodsWe analyzed 51 patients who received immunotherapy for metastatic renal or urothelial carcinoma at Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center between 2016 and 2020. A medical questionnaire consisting of 41 questions and laboratory tests were administered to the patients on the day of each ICI administration and 1 week afterwards. A significant complaint was defined as a complaint not addressed in the questionnaire immediately prior to the first ICI administration.
resultsFifty-one patients with metastatic renal or urothelial carcinoma were enrolled. The mean age was 72.1 years (range: 54-88 years). The male: female ratio was 32: 19. Of the total cohort, 26 (51%) patients had renal carcinoma, and 25 (49%) had urothelial carcinoma. The median follow-up time was 2.6 (range: 0.4-40.7) months. Thirty-three patients (65%) experienced irAEs.
conclusionsIn our cohort, periodic medical questionnaires and examinations were effective for early diagnosis and prompt treatment of irAEs. Although periodic examinations led to a high irAE diagnosis rate, the attendant medical cost was high. Further study is needed to find ways of addressing this issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.