Trial reportEuropean journal of endocrinology2022
Durable biochemical response and safety with oral octreotide capsules in acromegaly.
Trial report in European journal of endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Octreotide Subcutaneous Depot for Acromegaly: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase 3 Trial, ACROINNOVA 1.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Trial
- MPOWERED Trial Open-Label Extension: Long-term Efficacy and Safety Data for Oral Octreotide Capsules in Acromegaly.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2023Trial
- What is the future of acromegaly therapy?The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Review
- Current controversies in acromegaly care.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Review
- Current treatment landscape of acromegaly.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Review
- IGF-I levels during standard Lanreotide dose predicts biochemical outcome of high-frequency regimen in acromegaly.Pituitary · 2024Article
- Advances in the Oral Administration of Somatostatin Receptor Ligands in Acromegaly: A Systematic Review Focusing on Biochemical Response.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Oral Octreotide Capsules and Paltusotine in Management of Acromegaly.TouchREVIEWS in endocrinology · 2024Review
- Clinical Pharmacology of Oral Octreotide Capsules for the Treatment of Acromegaly.TouchREVIEWS in endocrinology · 2024Review
- Acromegaly: Pathophysiological Considerations and Treatment Options Including the Evolving Role of Oral Somatostatin Analogs.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2023Review
- Modern approach to resistant acromegaly.Endocrine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study is to report results from the open-label extension (OLE) of the OPTIMAL trial of oral octreotide capsules (OOC) in adults with acromegaly, evaluating the long-term durability of therapeutic response. Design: The study design is an OLE of a double-blind placebo-controlled (DPC) trial. Methods: Patients completing the 36-week DPC period on the study drug (OOC or placebo) or meeting predefined withdrawal criteria were eligible for OLE enrollment at 60 mg/day OOC dose, with the option to titrate to 40 or 80 mg/day. The OLE is ongoing; week 48 results are reported. Results: Forty patients were enrolled in the OLE, 20 each having received OOC or placebo, with 14 and 5 patients completing the DPC period as responders, respectively. Ninety percent of patients completing the DPC period on OOC and 70% of those completing on placebo completed 48 weeks of the OLE. Maintenance of response in the OLE (i.e. insulin-like growth factor I (IGF1) ≤ 1.0 × upper limit of normal (ULN)) was achieved by 92.6% of patients who responded to OOC during the DPC period. Mean IGF1 levels were maintained between the end of the DPC period (0.91 × ULN; 95% CI: 0.784, 1.045) and week 48 of the OLE (0.90 × ULN; 95% CI: 0.750, 1.044) for those completing the DPC period on OOC. OOC safety was consistent with previous findings, with no increased adverse events (AEs) associated with the higher dose and improved gastrointestinal tolerability observed over time. Conclusions: Patients with acromegaly maintained long-term biochemical response while receiving OOC, with no new AEs observed with prolonged OOC exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.