Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36173601›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2022

Evaluation of the microencapsulation process of conidia of Trichoderma asperellum by spray drying.

Alinne Brandão Andalécio Camargos Braga, Cleiver Junio Martins Costa, Eloízio Júlio Ribeiro, Marta Fernanda Zotarelli, Líbia Diniz Santos

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Endophytic entomopathogenic fungi: The next frontier in mycological biocontrol.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Microorganisms · 2025
    Review
  4. Viability of microencapsulated species of Trichoderma as a strategy to optimize use in biological control.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alinne Brandão Andalécio Camargos BragaFaculty of Chemical Engineering, Federal University of Uberlândia, Patos de Minas, MG, Brazil.
Cleiver Junio Martins CostaFaculty of Chemical Engineering, Federal University of Uberlândia, Patos de Minas, MG, Brazil.
Eloízio Júlio RibeiroFaculty of Chemical Engineering, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6955-252X
Marta Fernanda ZotarelliFaculty of Chemical Engineering, Federal University of Uberlândia, Patos de Minas, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1609-6866
Líbia Diniz SantosFaculty of Chemical Engineering, Federal University of Uberlândia, Patos de Minas, MG, Brazil. libia@ufu.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7128-5280
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microencapsulation of microorganisms has been studied to increase product shelf life and stability to enable the application in sustainable agriculture. In this study, the microencapsulation of Trichoderma asperellum conidia by spray drying (SD) was evaluated. The objective was to assess the effect of drying air temperature and wall material (maltodextrin DE20, MD20) concentration on the microencapsulation and to identify the optimum conditions to produce, in high yield, microparticles with low moisture, high conidial viability and conidial survival. Microparticles were characterized in terms of morphology, particle size, and shelf life. A central composite rotatable design (CCRD) was used to evaluate the effect of operating parameters on drying yield (DY), moisture content, conidial viability (CV), and conidial survival (SP). Microencapsulation experiments were carried out under optimum conditions to validate the obtained model. The optimum temperature and MD20/conidia dry weight ratios were 80 °C and 1:4.5, respectively, which afforded a drying yield of 63.85 ± 0.86%, moisture content of 4.92 ± 0.07%, conidial viability of 87.10 ± 1.16%, and conidial survival of 85.78 ± 2.88%. Microencapsulation by spray drying using MD20 as wall material extended the viability of conidia stored at 29 °C compared with the control. The mathematical models accurately predicted all the variables studied, and the association of the microencapsulation technique using DE20 maltodextrin was able to optimize the process and increase the product's shelf life. It was also concluded that high inlet air temperatures negatively affected conidia survival, especially above 100 °C.

Indexed as

HypocrealesSpray DryingDesiccationSpores, FungalBiological controlCentral rotational compound designMicroparticlePowderWall material

Identifiers

PMID36173601
PMCPMC9679129
OpenAlexW4297964577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.