Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36173529›Full record

ReviewPlanta2022

Variations in Circadian Clock Organization & Function: A Journey from Ancient to Recent.

Alena Patnaik, Hemasundar Alavilli, Jnanendra Rath, Kishore C S Panigrahi, Madhusmita Panigrahy

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Planta, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Genes · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alena PatnaikSchool of Biological Sciences, National Institute of Science Education and Research, Jatni, Odisha, 752050, India.
Hemasundar AlavilliDepartment of Bioresources Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul, 05006, South Korea.
Jnanendra RathInstitute of Science, Visva-Bharati Central University, Santiniketan, West Bengal, 731235, India.
Kishore C S PanigrahiSchool of Biological Sciences, National Institute of Science Education and Research, Jatni, Odisha, 752050, India.
Madhusmita PanigrahySchool of Biological Sciences, National Institute of Science Education and Research, Jatni, Odisha, 752050, India. mpanigrahy@niser.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8153-014X
National Institute of Science Education and Research · INSejong University · KRVisva-Bharati University · IN

Funding

Department of Science and Technology SR/WOS-A/LS-369/2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionCircadian clock components exhibit structural variations in different plant systems, and functional variations during various abiotic stresses. These variations bear relevance for plant fitness and could be important evolutionarily. All organisms on earth have the innate ability to measure time as diurnal rhythms that occur due to the earth's rotations in a 24-h cycle. Circadian oscillations arising from the circadian clock abide by its fundamental properties of periodicity, entrainment, temperature compensation, and oscillator mechanism, which is central to its function. Despite the fact that a myriad of research in Arabidopsis thaliana illuminated many detailed aspects of the circadian clock, many more variations in clock components' organizations and functions remain to get deciphered. These variations are crucial for sustainability and adaptation in different plant systems in the varied environmental conditions in which they grow. Together with these variations, circadian clock functions differ drastically even during various abiotic and biotic stress conditions. The present review discusses variations in the organization of clock components and their role in different plant systems and abiotic stresses. We briefly introduce the clock components, entrainment, and rhythmicity, followed by the variants of the circadian clock in different plant types, starting from lower non-flowering plants, marine plants, dicots to the monocot crop plants. Furthermore, we discuss the interaction of the circadian clock with components of various abiotic stress pathways, such as temperature, light, water stress, salinity, and nutrient deficiency with implications for the reprogramming during these stresses. We also update on recent advances in clock regulations due to post-transcriptional, post-translation, non-coding, and micro-RNAs. Finally, we end this review by summarizing the points of applicability, a remark on the future perspectives, and the experiments that could clear major enigmas in this area of research.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsCircadian ClocksCircadian RhythmGene Expression Regulation, PlantArabidopsis ProteinsAbiotic stressCircadian clockCircadian rhythmDiurnal rhythmNutritional deficiencyPost-transcriptional

Identifiers

PMID36173529
OpenAlexW4298000049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.