ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2023
Detection of intracranial aneurysms using deep learning-based CAD system: usefulness of the scores of CNN's final layer for distinguishing between aneurysm and infundibular dilatation.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review of artificial intelligence methods for detection and segmentation of unruptured intracranial aneurysms using medical imaging.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2025Pooled it
- Low tube voltage and deep-learning reconstruction for reducing radiation and contrast medium doses in thin-slice abdominal CT: a prospective clinical trial.European radiology · 2024Trial
- Artificial Intelligence for Cerebral Aneurysm Management: Integrating Imaging, Hemodynamics, and Clinical Decision Support.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
- Imaging diagnosis of cystic intraparenchymal brain neoplasms.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Clinical artificial intelligence (AI) in Japan: Regulatory pathways, domain-specific evidence, and its data infrastructure from an international perspective.Global health & medicine · 2026Review
- The Evolution and Clinical Impact of Deep Learning Technologies in Breast MRI.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025Review
- The glymphatic system in oncology: from the perspective of a radiation oncologist.Journal of radiation research · 2025Review
- Methodological Challenges in Deep Learning-Based Detection of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Scoping Review.Neurointervention · 2025Review
- Applications of artificial intelligence in interventional oncology: An up-to-date review of the literature.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Comparison of state-of-the-art biopsy systems for ultrasound-guided breast biopsy using a chicken breast phantom.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2024Article
- Investigation of imaging features in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of benign and malignant breast lesions.Japanese journal of radiology · 2024Article
- The impact of large language models on radiology: a guide for radiologists on the latest innovations in AI.Japanese journal of radiology · 2024Review
- Fairness of artificial intelligence in healthcare: review and recommendations.Japanese journal of radiology · 2024Review
- Clinical Utility of Breast Ultrasound Images Synthesized by a Generative Adversarial Network.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Comparison of 1.5 T and 3 T magnetic resonance angiography for detecting cerebral aneurysms using deep learning-based computer-assisted detection software.Neuroradiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe evaluated the diagnostic performance of a clinically available deep learning-based computer-assisted diagnosis software for detecting unruptured aneurysms (UANs) using magnetic resonance angiography and assessed the functionality of the convolutional neural network (CNN) final layer score for distinguishing between UAN and infundibular dilatation (ID). MATERIALS AND
methodsEIRL brain aneurysm (EIRL_BA) was used in this study. The subjects were 117 UAN and/or ID cases including 100 UAN lesions (average sizes of 2.56 ± 1.45 mm) and 40 ID lesions (average sizes of 1.75 ± 0.41 mm) in any of internal carotid artery, middle cerebral artery, and anterior communicating artery, and 123 normal controls. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EIRL_BA were determined for UAN and ID or UAN only. Furthermore, the relationship between the lesion category and score was examined using a linear regression analysis model, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess whether the scores represent UAN-like characteristics.
resultsEIRL_BA showed a total of 203 candidates (an average of 1.73/case) in UAN and/or ID cases and 98 candidates (an average of 0.80/case) in normal controls. For diagnosing either UAN/ID, EIRL_BA showed an overall sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 84.2%, and accuracy of 83.7%, resulting in the positive likelihood ratio of 5.0. For diagnosing UAN only, the overall sensitivity of 89.0, specificity of 82.6%, and accuracy of 83.2% resulting in the positive likelihood ratio of 5.1. In a linear regression analysis, the scores significantly increased in the candidates' first and second ranks in UAN (p < 0.05) but not in ID. An ROC analysis using the score for diagnosing UAN showed an area under the curve of 0.836.
conclusionEIRL_BA is applicable for detecting small UAN, and the CNN's final layer scores may be an effective index for discriminating UAN and ID and representing the likelihood of UAN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.