Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36173472›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2022

Defatted silkworm pupae meal as an alternative protein source for cattle.

K M Rashmi, M Chandrasekharaiah, N M Soren, K S Prasad, C G David, Y Thirupathaiah, V Shivaprasad

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Potential uses of silkworm pupae (Frontiers in insect science · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Are insects a solution for feeding ruminants? Legislation, scientific evidence, and future challenges.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

K M RashmiAnimal Nutrition Division, ICAR - National Dairy Research Institute (Deemed University), Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India. rashmikm999@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4248-845X
M ChandrasekharaiahICAR - National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Adugodi, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560030, India. chandrasekharaiah_m@yahoo.com.
N M SorenICAR - National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Adugodi, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560030, India.
K S PrasadICAR - National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Adugodi, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560030, India.
C G DavidICAR - National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Adugodi, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560030, India.
Y ThirupathaiahCentral Sericultural Research and, Training Institute (CSRTI), Karnataka, Mysuru, 570008, India.
V ShivaprasadCentral Sericultural Research and, Training Institute (CSRTI), Karnataka, Mysuru, 570008, India.
National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology · INCentral Sericultural Research and Training Institute · INNational Dairy Research Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Silkworm pupae meal (SWP) is a protein-rich by-product of the silk reeling industry, available in a significant quantity. However, there has been little and insignificant research into the use of SWP in ruminants to date. In this view, the present study was conducted in two phases to evaluate the effect of different inclusion levels of defatted silkworm pupae meal (DSWP) on rumen fermentation, microbial protein synthesis and nutrient utilisation in cattle fed on finger millet straw (FMS)-based diet. Four isonitrogenous concentrate mixtures (CM) were prepared with DSWP replacing soybean meal (SBM) protein at 0 (T0), 10 (T1), 20 (T2) and 30% (T3). In phase I, a rumen fermentation experiment was conducted in a 4 × 4 Latin square design using four crossbred steers to study the effect of different levels of DSWP on rumen fermentation. No significant difference (P > 0.05) was observed in rumen fermentation parameters such as pH, ammonia nitrogen (NH

Indexed as

BombyxDietDietary ProteinsAmmoniaAnimalsCattleDigestionFatty Acids, VolatileFermentationNitrogenPupaPurinesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRumenSoybean ProteinsAmmoniaDietary ProteinsFatty Acids, VolatileNitrogenPurinesSoybean ProteinsAlternative feedstuffsDefatted silkworm pupae mealPurine derivativesRumen fermentationSoybean meal

Identifiers

PMID36173472
OpenAlexW4297536222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.