Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36173265›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. A2022

Accurate Vertical Excitation Energies of BODIPY/Aza-BODIPY Derivatives from Excited-State Mean-Field Calculations.

Daniele Toffoli, Matteo Quarin, Giovanna Fronzoni, Mauro Stener

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. A, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Velocity gauge for oscillator strength in ΔSCF theory.The Journal of chemical physics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. State-Specific Coupled-Cluster Methods for Excited States.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024
    Article
  6. Exact Excited-State Functionals of the Asymmetric Hubbard Dimer.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. State-Specific Configuration Interaction for Excited States.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniele ToffoliDipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi di Trieste, via L. Giorgieri 1, I-34127 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8225-6119
Matteo QuarinDipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi di Trieste, via L. Giorgieri 1, I-34127 Trieste, Italy.
Giovanna FronzoniDipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi di Trieste, via L. Giorgieri 1, I-34127 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5722-2355
Mauro StenerDipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi di Trieste, via L. Giorgieri 1, I-34127 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3700-7903

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report a benchmark study of vertical excitation energies and oscillator strengths for the HOMO → LUMO transitions of 17 boron-dipyrromethene (BODIPY) structures, showing a large variety of ring sizes and substituents. Results obtained at the time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) and at the delta-self-consistent-field (ΔSCF) by using 13 different exchange correlation kernels (within LDA, GGA, hybrid, and range-separated approximations) are benchmarked against the experimental excitation energies when available. It is found that the time-independent ΔSCF DFT method, when used in combination with hybrid PBE0 and B3LYP functionals, largely outperforms TDDFT and can be quite competitive, in terms of accuracy, with computationally more costly wave function based methods such as CC2 and CASPT2.

Identifiers

PMID36173265
PMCPMC9574914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.