Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36173253›Full record

Observational studyWomen's health (London, England)

Evaluating adherence to American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines at the first obstetric visit.

Diane Christopher, Amy Markese, Shawna Tonick, Lauren Carpenter, Margo S Harrison

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Diane ChristopherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Amy MarkeseDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7585-5781
Shawna TonickDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Lauren CarpenterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Margo S HarrisonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2940-2241
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

COLORADO WRHR CAREER DEVELOPMENT CENTERK12HD001271 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Saketh R Guntupalli · 1999 to 2026
$8.9M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD001271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis is a prospective observational cohort study with the objective of assessing adherence to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines regarding the first prenatal visit and determining what patient and provider factors are associated with high adherence in a faculty obstetric clinic at an academic medical center.

methodsThe American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines recommend addressing 72 topics early in prenatal care. A research assistant observed the first prenatal encounter and noted which topics were discussed during the visit. Patient and clinic characteristics were also collected. The primary outcome was the percentage of topics covered at each visit. After analyzing all encounters, patient encounters that scored above the median score were compared with encounters scoring below the median using bivariate comparisons with respect to patient and clinic characteristics. A multivariable Poisson regression model with robust error variance was performed on characteristics with a

resultsFifty-one patient encounters met inclusion criteria and the median score for topics covered was 74%. Patients with chronic disease were more likely to have a higher percentage of topics covered (odds ratio 1.67, 95% confidence interval: 0.91-3.09). Patients who completed a prenatal questionnaire were also more likely to have a higher percentage (odds ratio 2.28, 95% confidence interval: 1.00-5.15) as well as patients who had nurse-led education integrated into their visit during (odds ratio 1.82, 95% confidence interval: 1.19-2.78). Patient satisfaction had no correlation with the number of topics covered.

conclusionThe number of topics to cover at the first prenatal visit has expanded creating challenges for patients and providers. Integration of prenatal questionnaires and nurse-led education has the potential to address gaps in antenatal care.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionPrenatal CareCohort StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesAmerican College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelinesgenetic counselingpregnancy counselingprenatal care

Identifiers

PMID36173253
PMCPMC9527982
OpenAlexW4298088929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.