ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2022
Uniqueness of radiomic features in non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mitigating the impact of image processing variations on tumour [Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Uniqueness of radiomic features in non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe uniqueness of radiomic features, combined with their reproducibility, determines the reliability of radiomic studies. This study is to test the hypothesis that radiomic features extracted from a defined region of interest (ROI) are unique to the underlying structure (e.g., tumor). APPROACH: Two cohorts of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients were retrospectively retrieved from a GE and a Siemens CT scanner. The lung nodules (ROI) were delineated manually and radiomic features were extracted using IBEX. The same ROI was then translocated randomly to four other tissue regions of the same set of images: adipose, heart, lung beyond nodule, and muscle for radiomic feature extraction. Coefficient of variation (CV) within different ROIs and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) between lung nodule and a given tissue region were calculated to test to determine feature uniqueness. The radiomic features were considered nonunique when (1) the CV < 10% and CCC > 0.85 for over 50% of patients; and (2) the CCC > 0.85 appeared in ≥2 tissue regions beyond the defined region.
resultsIn total, 14 patients from GE and 18 patients from Siemens are analyzed. The results show that 12 features fall below the 10% CV threshold for over 50% of patients in the GE cohort and 29 features in the Siemens cohort. According to CCC, 18 radiomic features in GE and 16 features in Siemens are identified as nonunique, with 11 overlapping features. Combining CV and CCC, 9 of 123 calculated features (7.3%) are identified as nonunique to a defined ROI.
conclusionsRadiomic feature uniqueness should be considered to improve the reliability of radiomics study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.