Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36172973›Full record

ReviewJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2022

Clinical and imaging clues to the diagnosis and follow-up of ptosis and ophthalmoparesis.

Kevin R Keene, Hermien E Kan, Stijn van der Meeren, Berit M Verbist, Martijn R Tannemaat, Jan-Willem M Beenakker, Jan J G M Verschuuren

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kevin R KeeneCJ Gorter MRI Center, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9300-9888
Hermien E KanCJ Gorter MRI Center, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5772-7177
Stijn van der MeerenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4777-560X
Berit M VerbistDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1010-2583
Martijn R TannemaatDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2929-0390
Jan-Willem M BeenakkerCJ Gorter MRI Center, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0479-5587
Jan J G M VerschuurenDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4572-1501
Leiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ophthalmoparesis and ptosis can be caused by a wide range of rare or more prevalent diseases, several of which can be successfully treated. In this review, we provide clues to aid in the diagnosis of these diseases, based on the clinical symptoms, the involvement pattern and imaging features of extra-ocular muscles (EOM). Dysfunction of EOM including the levator palpebrae can be due to muscle weakness, anatomical restrictions or pathology affecting the innervation. A comprehensive literature review was performed to find clinical and imaging clues for the diagnosis and follow-up of ptosis and ophthalmoparesis. We used five patterns as a framework for differential diagnostic reasoning and for pattern recognition in symptomatology, EOM involvement and imaging results of individual patients. The five patterns were characterized by the presence of combination of ptosis, ophthalmoparesis, diplopia, pain, proptosis, nystagmus, extra-orbital symptoms, symmetry or fluctuations in symptoms. Each pattern was linked to anatomical locations and either hereditary or acquired diseases. Hereditary muscle diseases often lead to ophthalmoparesis without diplopia as a predominant feature, while in acquired eye muscle diseases ophthalmoparesis is often asymmetrical and can be accompanied by proptosis and pain. Fluctuation is a hallmark of an acquired synaptic disease like myasthenia gravis. Nystagmus is indicative of a central nervous system lesion. Second, specific EOM involvement patterns can also provide valuable diagnostic clues. In hereditary muscle diseases like chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia (CPEO) and oculo-pharyngeal muscular dystrophy (OPMD) the superior rectus is often involved. In neuropathic disease, the pattern of involvement of the EOM can be linked to specific cranial nerves. In myasthenia gravis this pattern is variable within patients over time. Lastly, orbital imaging can aid in the diagnosis. Fat replacement of the EOM is commonly observed in hereditary myopathic diseases, such as CPEO. In contrast, inflammation and volume increases are often observed in acquired muscle diseases such as Graves' orbitopathy. In diseases with ophthalmoparesis and ptosis specific patterns of clinical symptoms, the EOM involvement pattern and orbital imaging provide valuable information for diagnosis and could prove valuable in the follow-up of disease progression and the understanding of disease pathophysiology.

Indexed as

BlepharoptosisGraves OphthalmopathyMyasthenia GravisOphthalmoplegiaDiplopiaHumansPainExtra-ocular musclesImagingInvolvement patternNeuromuscular diseaseOphthalmoparesisPtosis

Identifiers

PMID36172973
PMCPMC9745561
OpenAlexW4297965575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.