ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2022
Impact of Intracoronary Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Procedural Outcomes Among Complex Patient Groups.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Pooled it
- Myocardial Revascularization in 2025: A Clinical Perspective on the Evolution of Technologies, Strategic Decision-Making, and Future Horizons.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- The UK Intracoronary Imaging Survey: Evaluation of Perceptions, Barriers, Education and Training.Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries followed by ST elevation myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock: early use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2025Article
- Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United States: Results from Big Data Analysis.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Article
- The Safety and Efficacy Profile of Magnesium-Based Bioresorbable Coronary Stents as Compared to Poly-L-Lactic Acid-Based Bioresorbable and Contemporary Drug-Eluting Coronary Stents-A Systematic Review.Cardiology research and practice · 2025Review
- Emerging Hybrid Intracoronary Imaging Technologies and Their Applications in Clinical Practice and Research.JACC. Cardiovascular interventions · 2024Review
- Racial/Ethnic, Sex, and Economic Disparities in the Utilization and Outcomes of Intracoronary Imaging.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024Article
- Hospital-Level Variability in Use of Intracoronary Imaging for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsArticle
- Intracoronary Imaging in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: The Eye Cannot Appreciate What It Cannot See.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Intracoronary imaging (ICI) has been shown to improve survival after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Whether this prognostic benefit is sustained across different indications remains unclear. Methods and Results All PCI procedures performed in England and Wales between April, 2014 and March 31, 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. The association between ICI use and in-hospital major acute cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events; composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, and reinfarction and mortality was examined using multivariable logistic regression analysis for different imaging-recommended indications as set by European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions consensus. Of 555 398 PCI procedures, 10.8% (n=59 752) were ICI-guided. ICI use doubled between 2014 (7.8%) and 2020 (17.5%) and was highest in left main PCI (41.2%) and lowest in acute coronary syndrome (9%). Only specific European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions imaging-recommended indications were associated with reduced major acute cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events and mortality, including left main PCI (odds ratio [OR], 0.45 [95% CI, 0.39-0.52] and 0.41 [95% CI, 0.35-0.48], respectively), acute coronary syndrome (OR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.70-0.82] and 0.70 [95% CI, 0.63-0.77]), and stent length >60 mm (OR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.59-0.94] and 0.72 [95% CI, 0.54-0.95]). Stent thrombosis and renal failure were associated with lower mortality (OR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.52-0.91]) and major acute cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (OR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.60-0.99]), respectively. Conclusions ICI use has more than doubled over a 7-year period at a national level but remains low, with <1 in 5 procedures performed under ICI guidance. In-hospital survival was better with ICI-guided than angiography-guided PCI, albeit only for specific indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.