ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2022
Quality assessment of consumer-facing websites on sodium reduction.
Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Misinformation on cardiovascular disease spreads through social networks: a scoping review.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Misinformation surrounding sodium reduction for blood pressure: content analysis of Japanese posts on X.Health promotion international · 2024Article
- Consumer Informatics and One Health: Shifting the Focus from the Individual to the Globe. Findings from the Yearbook 2023 Section on Education and Consumer Health Informatics.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2023Article
- Information available on consumer-facing websites may affect adherence to important public health measures such as reducing sodium consumption.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2022Article
- Quality assessment of consumer-facing websites on sodium reduction.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2022Article
- Pitfalls in website information on dietary sodium restriction.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the quality of information and guidance on dietary sodium reduction available on consumer-facing websites. Google Trends was used to identify the five most-used search terms related to dietary sodium reduction. For each term, websites on the first two pages were collected (n = 18-20). Of 93 websites collected, 24 were excluded due to defective links, duplicate websites, or not being consumer-focused. The remaining 69 websites were evaluated using a novel instrument, JHU-SALT, that includes 14 questions on topics related to salt reduction. The questions are grouped into three domains ("information," "guidance," and "accuracy"). For each question, websites were scored using a 3-step ordinal scale ("topic not addressed," "topic somewhat addressed," or "topic addressed adequately"). Only three of 14 JHU-SALT questions were addressed adequately by a majority of websites. Many websites provided information on the adverse health effects of a high sodium diet (74%, n = 51) or mentioned intake recommendations (64%, n = 44). Information on fundamental concepts was largely missing. The majority of websites (80%, n = 55) provided information on lifestyle strategies to reduce blood pressure, but most did not provide guidance to help implement those strategies. While missing information was common, misinformation was uncommon. The DISCERN questionnaire was utilized as well. Consumers seeking information and guidance on dietary sodium reduction will find that most available websites provide accurate but limited information, and insufficient guidance on how to lower sodium intake. Websites that provide both relevant information and guidance are needed to help consumers effectively reduce dietary sodium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.