Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36172621›Full record

ReviewInfection and drug resistance2022

Prevalence and Outcomes of COVID -19 Patients with Happy Hypoxia: A Systematic Review.

Ben Bepouka, Ossam Odio, Nadine Mayasi, Murielle Longokolo, Donat Mangala, Madone Mandina, Marcel Mbula, Jean Marie Kayembe, Hippolyte Situakibanza

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infection and drug resistance, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. 'Choose well' is not good advice to people in need of NHS care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ben BepoukaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, The Democratic Republic of the Congo.ORCID 0000-0003-3063-4234
Ossam OdioDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, The Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Nadine MayasiDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, The Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Murielle LongokoloDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, The Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Donat MangalaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, The Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Madone MandinaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, The Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Marcel MbulaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, The Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Jean Marie KayembeDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, The Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Hippolyte SituakibanzaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, The Democratic Republic of the Congo.
University of Kinshasa · CD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), some patients have low oxygen saturation without any dyspnea. This has been termed "happy hypoxia." No worldwide prevalence survey of this phenomenon has been conducted. This review aimed to summarize information on the prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of patients with happy hypoxia to improve their management. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of electronic databases for all studies published up to April 30, 2022. We included high-quality studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) tool for qualitative assessment of searches. The prevalence of happy hypoxia, as well as the mortality rate of patients with happy hypoxia, were estimated by pooled analysis and heterogeneity by I Results: Of the 25,086 COVID-19 patients from the 7 studies, the prevalence of happy hypoxia ranged from 4.8 to 65%. The pooled prevalence was 6%. Happy hypoxia was associated with age > 65 years, male sex, body mass index (BMI)> 25 kg/m2, smoking, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, high respiratory rate, and high d-dimer. Mortality ranged from 01 to 45.4%. The pooled mortality was 2%. In 2 studies, patients with dyspnea were admitted to intensive care more often than those with happy hypoxia. One study reported that the length of stay in intensive care did not differ between patients with dyspnea and those with happy hypoxia at admission. One study reported the need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in patients with happy hypoxia. Conclusion: The pooled prevalence and mortality of patients with happy hypoxia were not very high. Happy hypoxia was associated with advanced age and comorbidities. Some patients were admitted to the intensive care unit, although fewer than dyspneic patients. Its early detection and management should improve the prognosis.

Indexed as

COVID −19happy hypoxiaoutcomesprevalence

Identifiers

PMID36172621
PMCPMC9512283
OpenAlexW4296643213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.