Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36172561›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Comparative transcriptomics analysis of developing peanut (

Yue Wu, Ziqi Sun, Feiyan Qi, Mengdi Tian, Juan Wang, Ruifang Zhao, Xiao Wang, Xiaohui Wu, Xinlong Shi, Hongfei Liu and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yue WuSchool of Life Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Ziqi SunHenan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Henan Academy of Crop Molecular Breeding, State Industrial Innovation Center of Biological Breeding, Key Laboratory of Oil Crops in Huang-Huai-Hai Plains, Ministry of Agriculture, Henan Provincial Key Laboratory for Oil Crops Improvement, Innovation Base of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Feiyan QiHenan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Henan Academy of Crop Molecular Breeding, State Industrial Innovation Center of Biological Breeding, Key Laboratory of Oil Crops in Huang-Huai-Hai Plains, Ministry of Agriculture, Henan Provincial Key Laboratory for Oil Crops Improvement, Innovation Base of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Mengdi TianHenan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Henan Academy of Crop Molecular Breeding, State Industrial Innovation Center of Biological Breeding, Key Laboratory of Oil Crops in Huang-Huai-Hai Plains, Ministry of Agriculture, Henan Provincial Key Laboratory for Oil Crops Improvement, Innovation Base of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Juan WangHenan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Henan Academy of Crop Molecular Breeding, State Industrial Innovation Center of Biological Breeding, Key Laboratory of Oil Crops in Huang-Huai-Hai Plains, Ministry of Agriculture, Henan Provincial Key Laboratory for Oil Crops Improvement, Innovation Base of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Ruifang ZhaoHenan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Henan Academy of Crop Molecular Breeding, State Industrial Innovation Center of Biological Breeding, Key Laboratory of Oil Crops in Huang-Huai-Hai Plains, Ministry of Agriculture, Henan Provincial Key Laboratory for Oil Crops Improvement, Innovation Base of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Xiao WangHenan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Henan Academy of Crop Molecular Breeding, State Industrial Innovation Center of Biological Breeding, Key Laboratory of Oil Crops in Huang-Huai-Hai Plains, Ministry of Agriculture, Henan Provincial Key Laboratory for Oil Crops Improvement, Innovation Base of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Xiaohui WuCollege of Agronomy, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Xinlong ShiCollege of Agriculture, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China.
Hongfei LiuSchool of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Wenzhao DongHenan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Henan Academy of Crop Molecular Breeding, State Industrial Innovation Center of Biological Breeding, Key Laboratory of Oil Crops in Huang-Huai-Hai Plains, Ministry of Agriculture, Henan Provincial Key Laboratory for Oil Crops Improvement, Innovation Base of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Bingyan HuangHenan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Henan Academy of Crop Molecular Breeding, State Industrial Innovation Center of Biological Breeding, Key Laboratory of Oil Crops in Huang-Huai-Hai Plains, Ministry of Agriculture, Henan Provincial Key Laboratory for Oil Crops Improvement, Innovation Base of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Zheng ZhengHenan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Henan Academy of Crop Molecular Breeding, State Industrial Innovation Center of Biological Breeding, Key Laboratory of Oil Crops in Huang-Huai-Hai Plains, Ministry of Agriculture, Henan Provincial Key Laboratory for Oil Crops Improvement, Innovation Base of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Xinyou ZhangHenan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Henan Academy of Crop Molecular Breeding, State Industrial Innovation Center of Biological Breeding, Key Laboratory of Oil Crops in Huang-Huai-Hai Plains, Ministry of Agriculture, Henan Provincial Key Laboratory for Oil Crops Improvement, Innovation Base of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNZhengzhou University · CNHenan Agricultural University · CNHenan University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pod size is one of the most important agronomic features of peanuts, which directly affects peanut yield. Studies on the regulation mechanism underpinning pod size in cultivated peanuts remain hitherto limited compared to model plant systems. To better understand the molecular elements that underpin peanut pod development, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of chronological transcriptomics during pod development in four peanut accessions with similar genetic backgrounds, but varying pod sizes. Several plant transcription factors, phytohormones, and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways were significantly enriched among differentially expressed genes (DEGs) at five consecutive developmental stages, revealing an eclectic range of candidate genes, including

Indexed as

MAPK signaling pathwaypeanutphytohormonepod developmentpod sizetranscription factor

Identifiers

PMID36172561
PMCPMC9511224
OpenAlexW4295269336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.