Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36172526›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2022

Effectiveness of Microecological Preparations for Improving Renal Function and Metabolic Profiles in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.

Jiaxing Tan, Huan Zhou, Jiaxin Deng, Jiantong Sun, Xiaoyuan Zhou, Yi Tang, Wei Qin

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiaxing TanDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Huan ZhouDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jiaxin DengDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jiantong SunWest China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xiaoyuan ZhouWest China School of Public Health, West China Forth Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yi TangDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Wei QinDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Sichuan University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Determining whether microecological preparations, including probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics, are beneficial for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been debated. Moreover, determining which preparation has the best effect remains unclear. In this study, we performed a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to address these questions. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. Eligible RCTs with patients with CKD who received intervention measures involving probiotics, prebiotics, and/or synbiotics were included. The outcome indicators included changes in renal function, lipid profiles, inflammatory factors, and oxidative stress factors. Results: Twenty-eight RCTs with 1,373 patients were ultimately included. Probiotics showed greater effect in lowering serum creatinine [mean difference (MD) -0.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.34, -0.09] and triglycerides (MD -9.98, 95% CI -19.47, -0.49) than the placebo, with the largest surface area under the cumulative ranking curve, while prebiotics and synbiotics showed no advantages. Probiotics were also able to reduce malondialdehyde (MDA) (MD -0.54, 95% CI -0.96, -0.13) and increase glutathione (MD 72.86, 95% CI 25.44, 120.29). Prebiotics showed greater efficacy in decreasing high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (MD -2.06, 95% CI -3.79, -0.32) and tumor necrosis factor-α (MD -2.65, 95% CI -3.91, -1.39). Synbiotics showed a partially synergistic function in reducing MDA (MD -0.66, 95% CI -1.23, -0.09) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (MD -2.01, 95% CI -3.87, -0.16) and increasing total antioxidant capacity (MD 145.20, 95% CI 9.32, 281.08). Conclusion: The results indicated that microbial supplements improved renal function and lipid profiles and favorably affected measures of oxidative stress and inflammation in patients with CKD. After thorough consideration, probiotics provide the most comprehensive and beneficial effects for patients with CKD and might be used as the best choice for microecological preparations. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022295497, PROSPERO 2022, identifier: CRD42022295497.

Indexed as

chronic kidney diseasemetabolic profilesprebioticsprobioticsrenal functionsynbiotics

Identifiers

PMID36172526
PMCPMC9510395
OpenAlexW4296527397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.