ArticleTherapeutic advances in urology
Antimuscarinics for neurogenic overactive bladder in multiple sclerosis: real-life data.
Article in Therapeutic advances in urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical and urodynamic benefit of adding antimuscarinics after a loss of efficacy of intradetrusor botulinum toxin in patients with multiple sclerosis.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Antimuscarinics (AMs) represent the mainstay of treatment for storage lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) but few data are available on their impact in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Objective: To assess effectiveness and tolerability of AMs in MS patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO). Methods: Sixty consecutive outpatients, who started treatment with AMs at one centre, were recruited. The primary endpoint was change in Patient's Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale (PPIUS) at 6 months; secondary endpoints were post-void residual urine (PVR) and pads used daily. Incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Results: Significant reduction ( Conclusion: This study suggests that AMs are effective in MS patients, but their use should be tailored on every patient as even low dosages can be poorly tolerated. AEs, including neurological ones, are common.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.