Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36172417›Full record

ArticleJTCVS open2022

Surgical decision-making in advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer is influenced by more than just guidelines.

Terrance Peng, Albert J Farias, Kimberly A Shemanski, Anthony W Kim, Sean C Wightman, Scott M Atay, Robert J Canter, Elizabeth A David

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTCVS open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Terrance PengDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif.
Albert J FariasDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif.
Kimberly A ShemanskiDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif.
Anthony W KimDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif.
Sean C WightmanDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif.
Scott M AtayDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif.
Robert J CanterDepartment of Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, Calif.
Elizabeth A DavidDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif.
University of Southern California · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This qualitative study sought to uncover factors that influence decisions to offer curative-intent surgery for patients with advanced-stage (stage IIIB/IV) non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: A trained interviewer conducted open-ended, semistructured telephone interviews with cardiothoracic surgeons in the United States. Participants were recruited from the Thoracic Surgery Outcomes Research Network, with subsequent diversification through snowball sampling. Four hypothetical clinical scenarios were presented, each demonstrating varying levels of ambiguity with respect to international guideline recommendations. Interviews continued until thematic saturation was reached. Interview transcripts were coded using inductive reasoning and conventional content analysis. Results: Of the 27 participants, most had been in practice for ≤20 years (n = 23) and were in academic practice (n = 18). When considering nonguideline-concordant surgeries, participants were aware of relevant guidelines but acknowledged their limitations for unique scenarios. Surgeons perceived that a common barrier to offering surgery is incomplete nonsurgeon physician understanding of surgical capabilities or expected morbidity; and that improved education is necessary to correct these misperceptions. Surgeons expressed concern that undertaking a controversial resection for an individual patient could fracture trust built in long-term professional relationships. Surgeons may face pressure from patients to operate despite a low expectation of clinical benefit, leading to emotional turmoil for the patient and surgeon. Conclusions: This qualitative study generates the hypothesis that the scope of current guidelines, availability of clinical trial protocols, perceived surgical knowledge among nonsurgeon colleagues, interprofessional relationships, and emotional pressure all influence a surgeon's willingness to offer curative-intent surgery for patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Indexed as

disparitiesmultidisciplinaryNSCLC, non–small cell lung cancerqualitativesurgical decision-makingThORN, Thoracic Surgery Outcomes Research Network

Identifiers

PMID36172417
PMCPMC9510805
OpenAlexW4224983953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.