Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36172379›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Durable antibody and effector memory T cell responses in breastmilk from women with SARS-CoV-2.

Vignesh Narayanaswamy, Brian T Pentecost, Janice C Telfer, Amy S Burnside, Sallie S Schneider, Dominique Alfandari, Ryan L Baker, Aman Saiju, Sam Nodiff, Kathleen F Arcaro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Vignesh NarayanaswamyDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, United States.
Brian T PentecostDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, United States.
Janice C TelferDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, United States.
Amy S BurnsideDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, United States.
Sallie S SchneiderPioneer Valley Life Sciences Institute, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA, United States.
Dominique AlfandariDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, United States.
Ryan L BakerDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, United States.
Aman SaijuDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, United States.
Sam NodiffDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, United States.
Kathleen F ArcaroDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, United States.

Funding

Fruit and vegetable intervention in lactating women to reduce breast cancer risk: effects on breast cell DNA methylation, breast inflammation, and weightR01CA230478 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI ARCARO, KATHLEEN FRANCES, SIBEKO, LINDIWE N · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
Production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies to Xenopus ProteinsR24OD021485 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI ALFANDARI, DOMINIQUE R · 2017 to 2020
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA230478NIH HHS R24 OD021485
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Given that only 25% of pregnant women elect to receive a COVID-19 vaccine, maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection remains an important route of conferring protective passive immunity to breastfed infants of mothers who are not vaccinated. Methods: We enrolled 30 lactating participants between December 2020 and March 2021 who had a positive PCR-test and their first COVID-19 symptoms within the previous 21 days. Participants were asked to provide serial bilateral milk samples at 12 timepoints (~ every 3 days) over a period of 35 days. A second set of samples was collected at least four months after the beginning of the first set. Participants also were asked to provide their dried blood spots and infant stool samples. All samples were tested for receptor-binding domain (RBD)-specific immunoglobulin (Ig)A, IgG, and IgM. Milk samples were assessed for neutralizing ability against the spike protein and four SARS-CoV-2 variants: D614G, Alpha (B.1.1.7), Beta (B.1.351), and Gamma (P.1). Permeability of the breast epithelium was assessed by measuring the sodium to potassium ions (Na:K) in milk. Using flow cytometry, memory CD4 and CD8 T cells (CD45RO Results: Milk antibodies from SARS-CoV-2 positive participants neutralized the spike complex. Milk from 73, 90, and 53% of participants had binding reactivities to RBD-specific IgA, IgG, and IgM, respectively. In contrast to blood spots, which showed increased levels of IgG, but not IgA or IgM, the COVID-19 response in milk was associated with a robust IgA response. Twenty-seven percent of participants had increased breast-epithelium permeability, as indicated by Na:K ≥ 0.6. The percentage of CD45RO Conclusions: Antibodies in milk from participants with recent SARS-CoV-2 infection and those who recovered can neutralize the spike complex. For the first time we show that breastmilk T cells are enriched for mucosal memory T cells, further emphasizing the passive protection against SARS-CoV-2 conferred to infants

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MInfantLactationMemory T CellsMilk, HumanPotassiumPregnancyReceptors, CCR7SodiumCOVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MPotassiumReceptors, CCR7SodiumSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2breast milkbreast permeabilityCOVID-19flow cytometrymemory T cellsmucosal immunitySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36172379
PMCPMC9512087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.