ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Application of Improved DEA Algorithm in Public Management Problem Classification.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retracted: Application of Improved DEA Algorithm in Public Management Problem Classification.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-09-20Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/8BB93262D45FF58F9D5E0315D6A684
- Retracted
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to effectively solve the related problems in the process of public management, this research proposes an improved algorithm technology based on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and classification algorithm. With the help of lever management, this paper further solves and overcomes the problem of DEA algorithm itself and the defect of "relative effectiveness." At the same time, in order to avoid the impact on the input and output indicators, with the help of principal component analysis, taking the performance evaluation of public management departments as the research direction, this paper makes an empirical analysis on the performance evaluation of public management departments. The evaluation results of the index system show that the correlation coefficient between the efficiency value of the initial index system and the efficiency value of optimization 2 is 0.977759, and the correlation coefficient is less than 0.7. The evaluation results are more reasonable than those before the improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.