Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36172298›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2022

Low volume polyethylene glycol combined with senna versus high volume polyethylene glycol, which regimen is better for bowel preparation for colonoscopy? A randomized, controlled, and single-blinded trial.

Amir Sadeghi, Khaled Rahmani, Pardis Ketabi Moghadam, Saeed Abdi, Ali Jahanian, Mobin Fathy, Mahsa Mohammadi, Mehran Mahdavi Roshan, Meysam Olfatifar, Mohammad Reza Zali and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Patient-reported outcomes and measures applied in individuals undergoing colonoscopy surveillance for colorectal cancer: a scoping review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amir SadeghiResearch Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-9580-2676
Khaled RahmaniLiver and Digestive Research Center Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences Sanandaj Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-0860-8040
Pardis Ketabi MoghadamResearch Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science Tehran Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7110-2950
Saeed AbdiResearch Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-2375-3748
Ali JahanianResearch Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-8580-3560
Mobin FathyResearch Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-6624-2342
Mahsa MohammadiResearch Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-6346-8557
Mehran Mahdavi RoshanResearch Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science Tehran Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4758-3499
Meysam OlfatifarGastroenterology and Hepataology Diseases Research Center Qom University of Medical Sciences Qom Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-5011-1380
Mohammad Reza ZaliResearch Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-9293-7954
Mohammad Reza HatamnejadResearch Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-2239-5539
Mohsen RajabniaResearch Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-3123-4315
Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences · IRKurdistan University of Medical Sciences · IRQom University of Medical Science and Health Services · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Bowel preparation affects the quality of colonoscopy. Reaching the optimal preparation has been a challenge for years. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is the sole FDA-approved substance for this purpose. However, patients find it unpleasant and often complain about its adverse effects. In this study, we aimed to reduce these complaints by lowering the amount of PEG and adding senna which is an herbal stimulant laxative. Methods: Four hundred and eighty-six patients were admitted for colonoscopy. Finally, 382 patients were enrolled in the study and we divided them into two groups; 186 patients were placed in which conventional high volume PEG-alone regimen was consumed and 196 patients in which low volume PEG plus senna regimen was offered. The quality of colon preparation was compared between the two groups by independent two samples Results: The colon preparation quality was equally efficient in the two groups as 69.36% in the high volume PEG group and 71.94% in PEG plus senna group had adequate bowel preparation ( Conclusion: Besides the fact that bowel preparation by low volume PEG plus senna combination was noninferior to the conventional high volume PEG-alone regimen, the side effects were much less common with the low volume PEG plus senna regimen.

Indexed as

bowel preparationcolonoscopylaxativespolyethylene glycolsennaside effects

Identifiers

PMID36172298
PMCPMC9468427
OpenAlexW4295846713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.