Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36172203›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Prevalence and influencing factors of pandemic fatigue among Chinese public in Xi'an city during COVID-19 new normal: a cross-sectional study.

Ling Xin, Liuhui Wang, Xuan Cao, Yingnan Tian, Yisi Yang, Kexin Wang, Zheng Kang, Miaomiao Zhao, Chengcheng Feng, Xinyu Wang and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ling XinDepartment of Health Policy, School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Liuhui WangDepartment of Health Policy, School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Xuan CaoDepartment of Health Policy, School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Yingnan TianSchool of Business and Economics, University of San Carlos, Cebu, Philippines.
Yisi YangHarbin Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Harbin, China.
Kexin WangDepartment of Health Policy, School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Zheng KangDepartment of Health Policy, School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Miaomiao ZhaoDepartment of Health Management, School of Public Health, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Chengcheng FengDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Xinyu WangDepartment of Health Policy, School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Nana LuoDepartment of Health Policy, School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Huan LiuDepartment of Health Policy, School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Qunhong WuDepartment of Health Policy, School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Harbin Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University · CNHeilongjiang Center for Tuberculosis Control and Prevention · CNNantong University · CNUniversity of San Carlos · PH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess Chinese public pandemic fatigue and potential influencing factors using an appropriate tool and provide suggestions to relieve this fatigue. Methods: This study used a stratified sampling method by age and region and conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire survey of citizens in Xi'an, China, from January to February 2022. A total of 1500 participants completed the questionnaire, which collected data on demographics, health status, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) stressors, pandemic fatigue, COVID-19 fear, COVID-19 anxiety, personal resiliency, social support, community resilience, and knowledge, attitude, and practice toward COVID-19. Ultimately, 1354 valid questionnaires were collected, with a response rate of 90.0%. A binary logistic regression model was used to examine associations between pandemic fatigue and various factors. Result: Nearly half of the participants reported pandemic fatigue, the major manifestation of which was "being sick of hearing about COVID-19" (3.353 ± 1.954). The logistic regression model indicated that COVID-19 fear (OR = 2.392, 95% CI = 1.804-3.172), sex (OR = 1.377, 95% CI = 1.077-1.761), the pandemic's impact on employment (OR = 1.161, 95% CI = 1.016-1.327), and COVID-19 anxiety (OR = 1.030, 95% CI = 1.010-1.051) were positively associated with pandemic fatigue. Conversely, COVID-19 knowledge (OR = 0.894, 95% CI = 0.837-0.956), COVID-19 attitude (OR = 0.866, 95% CI = 0.827-0.907), COVID-19 practice (OR = 0.943, 95% CI = 0.914-0.972), community resiliency (OR = 0.978, 95% CI = 0.958-0.999), and health status (OR = 0.982, 95% CI = 0.971-0.992) were negatively associated with pandemic fatigue. Conclusion: The prevalence of pandemic fatigue among the Chinese public was prominent. COVID-19 fear and COVID-19 attitude were the strongest risk factors and protective factors, respectively. These results indicated that the government should carefully utilize multi-channel promotion of anti-pandemic policies and knowledge.

Indexed as

COVID-19FatigueChinaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPrevalenceCOVID-19influencing factorsnew normalpandemic fatiguepublic

Identifiers

PMID36172203
PMCPMC9511105
OpenAlexW4295234924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.