Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36172172›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2022

An update on treatment of penile cancer.

Juskaran Chadha, Jad Chahoud, Philippe E Spiess

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Criteria and indicators to evaluate quality of care in genitourinary tumour boards.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Tumor-infiltrating plasma cells are a prognostic factor in penile squamous cell carcinoma.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. MR imaging of penile pathology and prostheses.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. New Therapeutic Horizons for Advanced or Metastatic Penile Cancer.The Urologic clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Impact of HIV on HPV-related cancers in men who have sex with men: a review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  20. Metastatic Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma Responsive to Enfortumab Vedotin.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Juskaran ChadhaDepartment of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0974-0147
Jad ChahoudDepartment of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Philippe E SpiessDepartment of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Penile cancer is a rare malignancy, particularly in industrialized nations. In the United States, rates are approximately less than 1 per 100,000 men per year with just over 2000 new cases per year. However, there is significantly increased prevalence in developing nations, with limited treatment expertise and reduced access to care, further driving an unmet clinical need. The most noteworthy risk factor for penile cancer is the association with human papillomavirus infection, which may be present in up to 50% of all penile carcinomas. In addition to local primary tumor approaches, multimodality treatment strategies are vital to patients with clinical regional nodal disease, locally advanced disease. Presence and degree of lymph node involvement remains the most important prognostic factor and patients may benefit from multiple treatment strategies. Interim analysis data from the first randomized clinical trial is expected to yield results in mid/late 2024-early 2025. These treatment approaches include neoadjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant therapy, including chemotherapy and radiation. Systemic therapy for distant recurrent or metastatic disease is primarily a platinum-based chemotherapy, however with poor overall response. As poor outcomes remain high, particularly in indigent populations, there remains an unmet need for these patients, particularly for high level randomized trials and novel therapeutics. In this review, we will highlight treatment updates for penile cancer. In addition to standard of care, we will review novel lines of therapies including immunotherapies and targeted therapies as well as sequencing approaches.

Indexed as

HPVimmunotherapypenile cancerpenile squamous cell carcinomatherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID36172172
PMCPMC9511530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.