Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36172153›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Invasive ductal breast cancer molecular subtype prediction by MRI radiomic and clinical features based on machine learning.

Weiyong Sheng, Shouli Xia, Yaru Wang, Lizhao Yan, Songqing Ke, Evelyn Mellisa, Fen Gong, Yun Zheng, Tiansheng Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The impact of radiogenomics on breast cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Weiyong ShengDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China.
Shouli XiaFirst Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Yaru WangFirst Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Lizhao YanDepartment of Hand Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Songqing KeDepartment of Science and Technology Research Management, Wuhan Blood Center, Wuhan, China.
Evelyn MellisaDepartment of Emergency Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Fen GongFirst Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Yun ZhengDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Tiansheng TangDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Most studies of molecular subtype prediction in breast cancer were mainly based on two-dimensional MRI images, the predictive value of three-dimensional volumetric features from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for predicting breast cancer molecular subtypes has not been thoroughly investigated. This study aimed to look into the role of features derived from DCE-MRI and how they could be combined with clinical data to predict invasive ductal breast cancer molecular subtypes. Methods: From January 2019 to December 2021, 190 Chinese women with invasive ductal breast cancer were studied (32 triple-negative, 59 HER2-enriched, and 99 luminal lesions) in this institutional review board-approved retrospective cohort study. The image processing software extracted 1130 quantitative radiomic features from the segmented lesion area, including shape-based, first-order statistical, texture, and wavelet features. Three binary classifications of the subtypes were performed: triple-negative Results: EXtreme Gradient Boosting model showed the best performance in luminal and non-luminal groups, with AUC, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, F1-Score, false positive rate, precision, and geometric mean of 0.8282, 0.7524, 0.6542, 0.6964, 0.6086, 0.3458, 0.8524 and 0.7016, respectively. Meanwhile, the random forest model showed the best performance in HER2-overexpressed and non-HER2-overexpressed groups, with AUC, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, F1-Score, false positive rate, precision, and geometric mean of 0.8054, 0.2941, 0.9744, 0.7679, 0.4348, 0.0256, 0.8333 and 0.5353, respectively. Furthermore, eXtreme Gradient Boosting model showed the best performance in the triple-negative and non-triple-negative groups, with AUC, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, F1-Score, false positive rate, precision, and geometric mean of 0.9031, 0.9362, 0.4444, 0.8571, 0.9167, 0.5556, 0.8980 and 0.6450. Conclusion: Clinical data and three-dimension imaging features from DCE-MRI were identified as potential biomarkers for distinguishing between three molecular subtypes of invasive ductal carcinomas breast cancer. In the future, more extensive studies will be required to evaluate the findings.

Indexed as

breast cancermachine learningmolecular subtypesMRIradiomicsthree-dimension

Identifiers

PMID36172153
PMCPMC9510620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.