ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2022
Toward a unifying framework for the modeling and identification of motor primitives.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatiotemporal dynamics and substates underlie emotional signalling in facial movements.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Beat-aligned motor synergies and kinematic beat detection in street dance movements.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Human arm redundancy: a new approach for the inverse kinematics problem.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Synergy-Space Recurrent Neural Network for Transferable Forearm Motion Prediction from Residual Limb Motion.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- How to improve the muscle synergy analysis methodology?European journal of applied physiology · 2021Review
- Where Are You Throwing the Ball? I Better Watch Your Body, Not Just Your Arm!Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A large body of evidence suggests that human and animal movements, despite their apparent complexity and flexibility, are remarkably structured. Quantitative analyses of various classes of motor behaviors consistently identify spatial and temporal features that are invariant across movements. Such invariant features have been observed at different levels of organization in the motor system, including the electromyographic, kinematic, and kinetic levels, and are thought to reflect fixed modules-named motor primitives-that the brain uses to simplify the construction of movement. However, motor primitives across space, time, and organization levels are often described with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.