Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36172051›Full record

Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2022

Effect of Weight-Adjusted Phenylephrine, Norepinephrine, and Metaraminol for Elective Cesarean Delivery on Neonatal Acid-Base Status: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Tianyu Liu, Zhiyong Cheng, Shiya Zou, Chao Xu, Shoudong Pan, Huabei Zeng, Yidong Shan, Yi Feng, Hong Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tianyu Liu *Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Zhiyong Cheng *Department of Anesthesiology, Suqian Maternity Hospital, Suqian, Jangsu, People's Republic of China.
Shiya Zou *Department of Anesthesiology, Capital Institute of Pediatrics Affiliated Children's Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Chao XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Shoudong PanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Capital Institute of Pediatrics Affiliated Children's Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Huabei ZengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Suqian Maternity Hospital, Suqian, Jangsu, People's Republic of China.
Yidong ShanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Suqian Maternity Hospital, Suqian, Jangsu, People's Republic of China.
Yi FengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Hong ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-4392-7370
Peking University · CNCapital Institute of Pediatrics · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Many previous trials have compared the effects of different vasoactive drugs on cesarean section patients, but their infusion rate is based on experience rather than high-quality evidence. It is difficult to judge whether the effect of vasoactive drug comes from the better choice or a more appropriate at rates of vasoactive drugs. The effect of vasoactive drugs at the rates of the 90% effective dose needs to be verified and compared. Patients and Methods: Women undergoing elective caesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia were randomized to receive phenylephrine or norepinephrine or metaraminol infusion at the rate that was assumed to be the 90% effective dose. Anesthetic management was standardized and included fluid loading with 10 mL/kg of Ringer. The primary outcome was the umbilical artery pH. Results: 78 patients were included. The umbilical artery pH was not significantly different among the three groups (phenylephrine group: 7.33 ± 0.03 vs norepinephrine group: 7.33 ± 0.04 vs metaraminol group: 7.33 ± 0.04, P = 0.99). There were no significant differences in the incidence of hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, and nausea and vomiting among the three groups. The SBP of the phenylephrine group was significantly higher than that of the metaraminol group (adjustive P value = 0.005). Conclusion: Phenylephrine (0.54 μg/kg/min) or metaraminol (2 μg/kg/min) or norepinephrine (0.08 μg/kg/min) administered to healthy patients with elective cesarean section after spinal anesthesia has no significant effect on the acid-base balance of the fetus.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, SpinalHypotensionCesarean SectionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMetaraminolNorepinephrinePhenylephrinePregnancyVasoconstrictor AgentsMetaraminolNorepinephrinePhenylephrineVasoconstrictor Agentscesarean sectionfoetal acid-base balancerandomized controlled trialvasoactive drugs

Identifiers

PMID36172051
PMCPMC9511707
OpenAlexW4296788961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.