Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36171867›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2022

Experience of Nurses with Intravenous Fluid Monitoring for Patient Safety: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.

Jeongok Park, Sang Bin You, Hyejin Kim, Cheolmin Park, Gi Wook Ryu, Seongae Kwon, Youngkyung Kim, Sejeong Lee, Kayoung Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jeongok ParkMo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Nursing, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4978-817X
Sang Bin YouYonsei University College of Nursing, Seoul, South Korea.
Hyejin KimSeverance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea.
Cheolmin ParkDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.
Gi Wook RyuDepartment of Nursing, Hansei University, Gunpo-si, South Korea.
Seongae KwonYonsei University College of Nursing, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2143-2959
Youngkyung KimCollege of Nursing and Brain Korea 21 FOUR Project, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.
Sejeong LeeCollege of Nursing and Brain Korea 21 FOUR Project, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0911-4613
Kayoung LeeGachon University College of Nursing, Incheon, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3536-9428
Yonsei University · KRGachon University · KRHansei University · KRSeverance Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Medication administration is a complex process and constitutes a substantial component of nursing practice that is closely linked to patient safety. Although intravenous fluid administration is one of the most frequently performed nursing tasks, nurses' experiences with intravenous rate control have not been adequately studied. This study aimed to explore nurses' experiences with infusion nursing practice to identify insights that could be used in interventions to promote safe medication administration. Patients and methods: This qualitative descriptive study used focus group interviews of 20 registered nurses who frequently administered medications in tertiary hospitals in South Korea. Data were collected through five semi-structured focus group interviews, with four nurses participating in each interview. We conducted inductive and deductive content analysis based on the 11 key topics of patient safety identified by the World Health Organization. Reporting followed the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) checklist. Results: Participants administered infusions in emergency rooms, general wards, and intensive care units, including patients ranging from children to older adults. Two central themes were revealed: human factors and systems. Human factors consisted of two sub-themes including individuals and team players, while systems encompassed three sub-themes including institutional policy, culture, and equipment. Conclusion: This study found that nurses experienced high levels of stress when administering infusions in the correct dose and rate for patient safety. Administering and monitoring infusions were complicated because nursing processes interplay with human and system factors. Future research is needed to develop nursing interventions that include human and system factors to promote patient safety by reducing infusion-related errors.

Indexed as

intravenous infusionsmedication errorsmedication systemsnursespatient safety

Identifiers

PMID36171867
PMCPMC9512022
OpenAlexW4296718145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.