ReviewFrontiers in surgery2022
The development of machine learning in lung surgery: A narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging surgical oncology and personalized medicine: the role of artificial intelligence and machine learning in thoracic surgery.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Thoracic Surgery: A Review Bridging Innovation and Clinical Practice for the Next Generation of Surgical Care.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Machine learning reflects an artificial intelligence that allows applications to improve their accuracy to predict outcomes, eliminating the need to conduct explicit programming on them. The medical field has increased its focus on establishing tools for integrating machine learning algorithms in laboratory and clinical settings. Despite their importance, their incorporation is minimal in the medical sector yet. The primary goal of this study is to review the development of machine learning in the field of thoracic surgery, especially lung surgery. Methods: This article used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). The sources used to gather data are the PubMed, Cochrane, and CINAHL databases and the Google Scholar search engine. Results: The study included 19 articles, where ten concentrated on the application of machine learning in especially lung surgery, six focused on the benefits and limitations of machine learning algorithms in lung surgery, and three provided an overview of the future of machine learning in lung surgery. Conclusion: The outcome of this study indicates that the field of lung surgery has attempted to integrate machine learning algorithms. However, the implementation rate is low, owing to the newness of the concept and the various challenges it encompasses. Also, this study reveals the absence of sufficient literature discussing the application of machine learning in lung surgery. The necessity for future research on the topic area remains evident.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.