Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36171812›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in surgery2022

The development of machine learning in lung surgery: A narrative review.

Anas Taha, Dominik Valentin Flury, Bassey Enodien, Stephanie Taha-Mehlitz, Ralph A Schmid

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anas TahaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Dominik Valentin FluryDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Hirslanden Clinic Beau-Site (Hirslanden Group) / Lindenhof Hospital (Lindenhof Group Bern); University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Bassey EnodienDepartment of Surgery, Wetzikon Hospital, Wetzikon, Switzerland.
Stephanie Taha-MehlitzClarunis, University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Ralph A SchmidThorax-Schweiz, Hirslanden Cooperate Office, Glattpark, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Machine learning reflects an artificial intelligence that allows applications to improve their accuracy to predict outcomes, eliminating the need to conduct explicit programming on them. The medical field has increased its focus on establishing tools for integrating machine learning algorithms in laboratory and clinical settings. Despite their importance, their incorporation is minimal in the medical sector yet. The primary goal of this study is to review the development of machine learning in the field of thoracic surgery, especially lung surgery. Methods: This article used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). The sources used to gather data are the PubMed, Cochrane, and CINAHL databases and the Google Scholar search engine. Results: The study included 19 articles, where ten concentrated on the application of machine learning in especially lung surgery, six focused on the benefits and limitations of machine learning algorithms in lung surgery, and three provided an overview of the future of machine learning in lung surgery. Conclusion: The outcome of this study indicates that the field of lung surgery has attempted to integrate machine learning algorithms. However, the implementation rate is low, owing to the newness of the concept and the various challenges it encompasses. Also, this study reveals the absence of sufficient literature discussing the application of machine learning in lung surgery. The necessity for future research on the topic area remains evident.

Indexed as

deep learninglung surgerymachine learningnarrative reviewthoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID36171812
PMCPMC9510630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.