Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36171616›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2022

A Gated Recurrent Unit based architecture for recognizing ontology concepts from biological literature.

Pratik Devkota, Somya D Mohanty, Prashanti Manda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pratik DevkotaDepartment of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, USA.
Somya D MohantyDepartment of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, USA. sdmohant@uncg.edu.
Prashanti MandaInformatics and Analytics, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, USA.
University of North Carolina at Greensboro · US

Funding

National Science Foundation 1942727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnnotating scientific literature with ontology concepts is a critical task in biology and several other domains for knowledge discovery. Ontology based annotations can power large-scale comparative analyses in a wide range of applications ranging from evolutionary phenotypes to rare human diseases to the study of protein functions. Computational methods that can tag scientific text with ontology terms have included lexical/syntactic methods, traditional machine learning, and most recently, deep learning.

resultsHere, we present state of the art deep learning architectures based on Gated Recurrent Units for annotating text with ontology concepts. We use the Colorado Richly Annotated Full Text Corpus (CRAFT) as a gold standard for training and testing. We explore a number of additional information sources including NCBI's BioThesauraus and Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) to augment information from CRAFT for increasing prediction accuracy. Our best model results in a 0.84 F1 and semantic similarity.

conclusionThe results shown here underscore the impact for using deep learning architectures for automatically recognizing ontology concepts from literature. The augmentation of the models with biological information beyond that present in the gold standard corpus shows a distinct improvement in prediction accuracy.

Indexed as

Automated annotationDeep learningGene ontologyScientific literature

Identifiers

PMID36171616
PMCPMC9516808
OpenAlexW4297474060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.