Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2022
Early administration of hydrocortisone, vitamin C, and thiamine in adult patients with septic shock: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03872011 (Initiation of Vitamin C, Thiamine and Hydrocortisone Therapy for Septic Shock in Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Initiation of Vitamin C, Thiamine and Hydrocortisone Therapy for Septic Shock in Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Corticosteroids for treating sepsis in children and adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of different vitamins on individuals with septic shock: a Bayesian NMA of RCTs.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Therapeutic Role of HAT Therapy in Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Hydrocortisone, Ascorbic Acid, and Thiamine Combination Therapy for the Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.International archives of allergy and immunology · 2024Pooled it
- The outcome of IV vitamin C therapy in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Effect of intravenous vitamin C on adult septic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Pooled it
- Early administration of vitamin C in patients with sepsis or septic shock in emergency departments: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial: the C-EASIE trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Trial
- Electroacupuncture as Adjunctive Therapy for Organ Dysfunction Among Chinese ICU Patients with Sepsis: Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial.Current medical science · 2026Article
- Current and emerging therapeutic options for refractory septic shock: A systematic review.World journal of critical care medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical application and impact of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of infectious diseases in severely immunocompromised pediatric patients.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Early, very high-dose, and prolonged vitamin C administration in murine sepsis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Clinical implement of Probe-Capture Metagenomics in sepsis patients: A multicentre and prospective study.Clinical and translational medicine · 2025Article
- The Japanese Critical Care Nutrition Guideline 2024.Journal of intensive care · 2025Review
- The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2024.Journal of intensive care · 2025Article
- Expression of Serum LMAN2 and Sestrin2 in Septic Shock Patients and Exploration of Their Prognostic Value.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Vitamin C for sepsis: from mechanisms to individualized therapy.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Differential effects of thiamine and ascorbic acid in clusters of septic patients identified by latent variable analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Article
- Towards personalized medicine: a scoping review of immunotherapy in sepsis.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Article
- Recent Data about the Use of Corticosteroids in Sepsis-Review of Recent Literature.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- The effects of antioxidant supplementation on short-term mortality in sepsis patients.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe combination therapy of hydrocortisone, vitamin C, and thiamine has been proposed as a potential treatment in patients with sepsis and septic shock. However, subsequent trials have reported conflicting results in relation to survival outcomes. Hence, we performed this randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of early combination therapy among adult patients with septic shock.
methodsThis single-center, double-blind RCT enrolled adult patients with diagnosis of septic shock within 12 h from Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital between February 2019 and June 2021. Recruited patients were randomized 1:1 to receive intervention (hydrocortisone 200 mg daily, vitamin C 2 g every 6 h, and thiamine 200 mg every 12 h) or placebo (0.9% saline) for 5 days or until ICU discharge. The primary endpoint was 90-day mortality. The secondary endpoints included mortality at day 28, ICU discharge, and hospital discharge; shock reversal; 72-h Delta SOFA score; ICU-free days, vasopressor-free days, and ventilator support -free days up to day 28; ICU length of stay (LOS) and hospital LOS.
resultsAmong 426 patients randomized, a total of 408 patients with septic shock were included in the per-protocol (PP) analysis, of which 203 were assigned to the intervention group and 205 to the placebo group. In the PP population, the primary outcome of 90-day mortality was 39.9% (81/203) and 39.0% (80/205) in the intervention and the placebo groups, respectively, and was not significantly different (P = 0.86). There was no significant difference between two groups in 28-day mortality (36.5% vs. 36.1%, P = 0.94) or the ICU mortality (31.5% vs. 28.8%, P = 0.55) and hospital mortality (34.5% vs. 33.2%, P = 0.78). No other secondary outcomes showed significant differences between two groups, including shock reversal, vasopressor-free days, and ICU LOS. Intention-to-treat analysis included all the 426 patients and confirmed these results (all P > 0.05).
conclusionAmong adult patients with septic shock, early use of hydrocortisone, vitamin C, and thiamine combination therapy compared with placebo did not confer survival benefits. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03872011 , registration date: March 12, 2019.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.