Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36171578›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2022

Validation of an automated immunoturbidimetric assay for feline serum amyloid A.

Elspeth M Waugh, Hayley Haining, James Harvie, Alison E Ridyard, P David Eckersall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elspeth M WaughVeterinary Diagnostic Services, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. elspeth.waugh@glasgow.ac.uk.
Hayley HainingVeterinary Diagnostic Services, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
James HarvieVeterinary Diagnostic Services, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Alison E RidyardSmall Animal Clinical Services, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
P David EckersallInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
University of Glasgow · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSerum Amyloid A (SAA) is a major acute phase protein in cats, increasing rapidly in response to various inflammatory diseases. An automated latex-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay for human SAA (LZ-SAA, Eiken), previously validated for use in cats, has had further major modification (VET-SAA, Eiken) for specific use in veterinary diagnostic laboratories but has yet to be validated in cats.

resultsIntra-assay and inter-assay CVs for the VET-SAA assay ranged from 1.88-3.57% and 3.98-6.74%, respectively. Linearity under dilution was acceptable with no prozone effect observed. Limit of detection was 1.65 mg/L and limit of quantification was 6 mg/L. Haemoglobin and triglyceride showed no adverse interference, but bilirubin produced positive bias in samples with low SAA. Comparison with the LZ-SAA assay showed significant correlation with proportional bias increasing as SAA concentration increased, likely related to differing calibration standards. SAA was significantly higher in patients with inflammatory disease compared with non-inflammatory disease, and in patients with moderate to highly elevated α1-AGP compared with patients with normal α1-AGP. Improvement of the assay range may be required to fully evaluate differences between disease groups at low SAA levels. Based on ROC curve analysis, at a cut-off point of 20.1 mg/L the VET-SAA assay discriminated between inflammatory and non-inflammatory disease with sensitivity of 0.93 and specificity of 0.99.

conclusionsThe automated VET-SAA assay is a robust, precise, and accurate method for measurement of feline SAA which can clearly identify patients with inflammatory disease. It should be a valuable biomarker for use in feline medicine.

Indexed as

ImmunoturbidimetrySerum Amyloid A ProteinAcute-Phase ProteinsAnimalsBilirubinBiomarkersCatsHumansLatexTriglyceridesAcute-Phase ProteinsBilirubinBiomarkersLatexSerum Amyloid A ProteinTriglyceridesAcute phase proteinAssayFelineInflammationSerum amyloid AValidation

Identifiers

PMID36171578
PMCPMC9516510
OpenAlexW4297474742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.