Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36171574›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Determining the influence of the primary and specialist network of care on patient and system outcomes among patients with a new diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

J Tranmer, T Rotter, D O'Donnell, D Marciniuk, M Green, L Kinsman, W Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. A Multi-Specialty Delphi Consensus on Assessing and Managing Cardiopulmonary Risk in Patients with COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2024
    Article
  8. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Article
  9. How can Canada's health systems improve care for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J TranmerFrom the Department of Medicine, Family Medicine and Nursing ICES-Queen's and Queen's Health Services Policy Research Institute Queen's Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada. tranmerj@queensu.ca.
T RotterFrom the Department of Medicine, Family Medicine and Nursing ICES-Queen's and Queen's Health Services Policy Research Institute Queen's Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
D O'DonnellFrom the Department of Medicine, Family Medicine and Nursing ICES-Queen's and Queen's Health Services Policy Research Institute Queen's Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
D MarciniukRespiratory Research Center, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
M GreenFrom the Department of Medicine, Family Medicine and Nursing ICES-Queen's and Queen's Health Services Policy Research Institute Queen's Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
L KinsmanSchool of Evidence Based Nursing, University of New Castle, New Castle, Australia.
W LiFrom the Department of Medicine, Family Medicine and Nursing ICES-Queen's and Queen's Health Services Policy Research Institute Queen's Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Queen's University · CAUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCare for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is provided by both family physicians (FP) and specialists. Ideally, patients receive comprehensive and coordinated care from this provider team. The objectives for this study were: 1) to describe the family and specialist physician network of care for Ontario patients newly diagnosed with COPD and 2) to determine the associations between selected characteristics of the physician network and unplanned healthcare utilization.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using Ontario health administrative data housed at ICES (formerly the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences). Ontario patients, ≥ 35 years, newly diagnosed with COPD were identified between 2005 and 2013. The FP and specialist network of care characteristics were described, and the relationship between selected characteristics (i.e., continuity of care) with unplanned healthcare utilization during the first 5 years after COPD diagnosis were determined in multivariate models.

resultsOur cohort consisted of 450,837 patients, mean age 61.5 (SD 14.6) years. The FP was the predominant provider of care for 86.4% of the patients. Using the Bice-Boxerman's Continuity of Care Index (COCI), a measure reflecting care across different providers, 227,082 (50.4%) were categorized in a low COCI group based on a median cut-off. In adjusted analyses, patients in the low COCI group were more likely to have a hospital admission (OR = 2.27, 95% CI 2.20,2.22), 30-day readmission (OR = 2.44, 95% CI 2.39, 2.49) and ER visit (OR = 2.27, 95% CI 2.25, 2.29).

conclusionHigher indices of continuity of care are associated with reduced unplanned hospital use for patients with COPD. Primary care-based practice models to enhance continuity through coordination and integration of both primary and specialist care have the potential to enhance the health experience for patients with COPD and should be a health service planning priority.

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveContinuity of Patient CareHospitalizationHumansMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionRetrospective StudiesChronic disease managementChronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseContinuity of care

Identifiers

PMID36171574
PMCPMC9520829
OpenAlexW4297520966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.