ArticleBMC cancer2022
Validating ORR and PFS as surrogate endpoints in phase II and III clinical trials for NSCLC patients: difference exists in the strength of surrogacy in various trial settings.
Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond cold to hot: oncolytic virotherapy as the next cornerstone of immuno-oncology.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Key considerations when assessing clinical utility for biomarker testing: A checklist.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2026Article
- Design Characteristics and Survival Outcomes of Local Trials Supporting the Approval of Targeted Anticancer Drugs in China.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Rationale for incorporating short-term endpoints in interim futility analysis of phase 3 oncology trials: a simulation study.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- Evaluating Circulating Tumor DNA Clearance as an Early Intermediate End Point Predicting Clinical Benefit in Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC After First-Line Chemoimmunotherapy.JTO clinical and research reports · 2025Article
- Supporting evidence in phase 2 cancer trial protocols: a content analysis.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
- Microbiota-mediated modulation of radiosensitivity: mechanisms and therapeutic prospects of oral and gut microbiota, metabolites, and probiotics.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Frequently asked questions on surrogate endpoints in oncology-opportunities, pitfalls, and the way forward.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Review
- Efficacy of ALK inhibitors in Asian patients with ALK inhibitor-naïve advancedTranslational lung cancer research · 2024Article
- Predict progression free survival and overall survival using objective response rate for anti-PD1/PDL1 therapy development.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Can blood-based markers predict RECIST progression in non-small cell lung cancer treated with immunotherapy?Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Adjuvant and neoadjuvant use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in NSCLC.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Intermediate endpoints as surrogates for outcomes in cancer immunotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase 3 trials.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
- PLEKHG2 Promotes NSCLC Cell Growth by Increasing Glycolysis via Activated PI3K/AKT Pathway.Journal of Cancer · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to systematically validate the performance of surrogate endpoints in phase II and III clinical trials for NSCLC patients under various trial settings.
methodsA literature search retrieved all registered phase II and III trials of NSCLC patients in which OS, with at least one of ORR and PFS, were reported. Associations between surrogate and true endpoints were assessed on two levels. On the arm level, three pairs of correlations, i.e., ORR vs. median OS, ORR vs. median PFS, and median PFS vs. median OS, were analysed using Spearman's rho. On the trial level, similarly, three pairs of correlations, i.e., ΔORR vs. HR of OS, ΔORR vs. HR of PFS, and HR of PFS vs. HR of OS, were analysed using Spearman's rho and weighted linear regression model respectively. Finally, sensitivity analyses were performed to explore surrogacy under various trial settings.
resultsAt arm level, three pairs of correlations are all high (Spearman's rho = 0.700, 0.831, 0.755, respectively). At trial level, there is a low correlation between ΔORR and HR of OS, a high correlation between ΔORR and HR of PFS and a moderate correlation between HR of PFS and HR of OS (Spearman's rho = 0.462, 0.764, 0.584, respectively). In the sensitivity analysis, we find correlations between surrogate and true endpoints vary by different trial settings. It is noteworthy that the strength of surrogacy of these intermediate endpoints in targeted therapy is greater than that in immunotherapy.
conclusionAccording to the arm-level and trial level-analysis, we suggest that in phase II and III trials of targeted therapy and immunotherapy for NSCLC patients: 1) ORR lacks validity for the surrogacy of OS, excluding in first-line therapy, and 2) ORR may be an appropriate surrogate endpoint for PFS, and 3) PFS may be considered a modest surrogacy for OS, with better performance in first-line therapy trials. Moreover, to provide more convincing evidence of surrogacy of the surrogate endpoints, patient-level analyses are in desperate need.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.