Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36171474›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A noninferiority trial comparing left paratracheal pressure versus cricoid pressure on tracheal intubation conditions using the Pentax Airway Scope.

Ha Yeon Kim, Jee Hwan Moon, Hee Yeon Park, Sang Kee Min, Jong Yeop Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ha Yeon KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
Jee Hwan MoonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
Hee Yeon ParkDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gachon University, Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.
Sang Kee MinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
Jong Yeop KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea. kjyeop@ajou.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are no studies evaluating the effect of left paratracheal pressure (PP) on difficulty of intubation using Pentax Airway Scope (Pentax), so we conducted this study to show that PP was not inferior to cricoid pressure (CP) in intubation time using the Pentax. Patients aged 19-70 years, with an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 or 2, and undergoing otorhinolaryngological, gynecological surgery, and cholecystectomy at a single university hospital were enrolled. Intubation was performed using the Pentax under PP or CP of 30 N. The primary outcome was intubation time, and the secondary outcomes were tube advancement difficulty and glottis view. The mean difference in intubation time (PP group - CP group) was - 4.19 s (95% CI - 8.24 to - 0.15), which was within the non-inferiority margin of 6.5 s, thus proving non-inferiority of the PP compared with the CP group. However, the score for tube advancement difficulty was significantly lower in the PP group than in the CP group (p = 0.02). PP did not prolong the intubation time and showed comparable intubation conditions to CP in intubation using the Pentax. Therefore, PP may be a good alternative maneuver to prevent gastric regurgitation during intubation using the Pentax.

Indexed as

LaryngoscopesGlottisHumansIntubation, IntratrachealLaryngoscopyRespiratory System

Identifiers

PMID36171474
PMCPMC9519916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.