Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36171411›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of colorectal disease2022

Prevention of delayed post-polypectomy bleeding by prophylactic clipping after endoscopic colorectal polypectomy: a meta-analysis.

Zheng Yu, Eduardo Albéniz, Jing Hu, Peilin Li, Quan Li, Yaojun Hu, Jinpin Chen, Jinpeng Wang

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of colorectal disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Dietary restriction after cold snare polypectomy of colorectal polyp for prevention of delayed bleeding.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zheng YuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fu Xing Hospital, Capital Medical University, #20, Fuxingmenwai Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100038, China. yuzheng0928@163.com.
Eduardo AlbénizGastroenterology Department, Endoscopy Unit, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Navarrabiomed Research Center, UPNA, Pamplona, IdiSNA, Spain.
Jing HuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fu Xing Hospital, Capital Medical University, #20, Fuxingmenwai Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100038, China.
Peilin LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fu Xing Hospital, Capital Medical University, #20, Fuxingmenwai Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100038, China.
Quan LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fu Xing Hospital, Capital Medical University, #20, Fuxingmenwai Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100038, China.
Yaojun HuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fu Xing Hospital, Capital Medical University, #20, Fuxingmenwai Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100038, China.
Jinpin ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fu Xing Hospital, Capital Medical University, #20, Fuxingmenwai Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100038, China.
Jinpeng WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fu Xing Hospital, Capital Medical University, #20, Fuxingmenwai Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100038, China.
Capital Medical University · CNComplejo Hospitalario de Navarra · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis meta-analysis aims to investigate the role of prophylactic clipping after endoscopic colorectal polypectomy or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in prevention of delayed bleeding (DB) following polypectomy.

methodsWe searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials comparing the effect of prophylactic clipping versus no clipping on DB since inception to 22nd April 2022. We then performed a meta-analysis using a random-effects model.

resultsWe included 8 studies with 5648 patients and 10,436 lesions. Prophylactic clipping did not reduce the overall risk of DB compared with no clipping (1.54% vs 2.05%; Log RR, -0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.59, 0.01; P = 0.06). In subgroup analyses, clipping significantly reduced DB rate in polyps ≥ 2 cm (Log RR, -0.63; 95% CI, -1.08, -0.18; P = 0.01), in non-pedunculated polyps (Log RR, -0.63; 95% CI, -1.01, -0.24; P = 0.00), and in large (≥ 2 cm) proximal polyps (Log RR, -0.81; 95% CI, -1.56, 0.05; P = 0.04), but not in polyps < 2 cm (Log RR, 0.01; 95% CI, -.40, 0.42; P = 0.95).

conclusionProphylactic clipping does not prevent post-polypectomy bleeding after all EMR and should not be performed as a routine practice. Although prophylactic clipping may reduce DB rate following resection of large proximal polyps and non-pedunculated polyps, more high-quality studies are needed to determine the effects of factors such as polyp location, polyp morphology, antithrombotic drug use and complete or partial closure on the effectiveness of prophylactic clipping.

Indexed as

Colonic PolypsColorectal NeoplasmsEndoscopic Mucosal ResectionColonoscopyFibrinolytic AgentsHumansPostoperative HemorrhageFibrinolytic AgentsBleedingClipColonoscopyEndoscopic mucosal resectionPolypectomy

Identifiers

PMID36171411
OpenAlexW4297515908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.