Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36171410›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Decomposition stages as a clue for estimating the post-mortem interval in carcasses and providing accurate bird collision rates.

Virginia Moraleda, Julia Gómez-Catasús, Claudia Schuster, Luis M Carrascal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Virginia MoraledaGrupo de Rehabilitación de la Fauna Autóctona y su Hábitat, GREFA, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Julia Gómez-CatasúsNovia University of Applied Sciences, Raseborgvägen 9, 10600, Ekenäs, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-8949-5318
Claudia SchusterGrupo de Rehabilitación de la Fauna Autóctona y su Hábitat, GREFA, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Luis M CarrascalDepartamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN-CSIC), 28006, Madrid, Spain. lmcarrascal@mncn.csic.es.ORCID 0000-0003-1288-5531

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The estimation of the post-mortem interval is crucial to accurately provide bird collision rates against manmade infrastructures. Standard methodologies recommend initially clearing all carcasses to ensure that subsequent collisions can be attributed to known time intervals. In this study, we propose a more cost-efficient approach aiming to link the decomposition stages as unequivocally as possible to the most likely time elapsed since death. Factors influencing the decomposition stages of bird carcasses were evaluated by means of two experiments. Firstly, we examined carcasses of large birds in three seasons differing in temperature, sun radiation and humidity: summer, autumn and spring. Secondly, we tested the influence of body mass in the same season (spring) using small, medium-sized and large bird carcasses. Results showed that the decomposition score increased monotonically with time, attaining the highest magnitude effect. A carcass with a decomposition score ≥ 4 (skeletal reduction) was in the field for ≥ 15 days, whereas a carcass with a score < 3 (fresh or emphysematous) was exposed < 3 days. Decomposition scores were higher in summer and did not differ among carcass sizes. This study provides an alternative protocol to estimate the post-mortem interval in wild birds in studies in search of bird fatalities.

Indexed as

BirdsPostmortem ChangesAnimalsAutopsyCadaverSeasonsTemperature

Identifiers

PMID36171410
PMCPMC9519910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.