ArticleScientific reports2022
Genome-wide identification and development of miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements and intron length polymorphic markers in tea plant (Camellia sinensis).
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- The gene-like promoter and transcription of LTR retrotransposons.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Plant MITEs: miniature transposable elements with major impacts.Mobile DNA · 2025Review
- Exploring the genomic landscape of mites and harnessing MITE insertion polymorphism markers in jute (Corchorus sp.).Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Genome-wide characterization and evolution analysis of miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements in Barley (Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of Transposable Elements in Strawberry Genomes of Different Ploidy Levels.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Application of Multi-Perspectives in Tea Breeding and the Main Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Marker-assisted breeding and tagging of important quantitative trait loci for beneficial traits are two important strategies for the genetic improvement of plants. However, the scarcity of diverse and informative genetic markers covering the entire tea genome limits our ability to achieve such goals. In the present study, we used a comparative genomic approach to mine the tea genomes of Camellia sinensis var. assamica (CSA) and C. sinensis var. sinensis (CSS) to identify the markers to differentiate tea genotypes. In our study, 43 and 60 Camellia sinensis miniature inverted-repeat transposable element (CsMITE) families were identified in these two sequenced tea genomes, with 23,170 and 37,958 putative CsMITE sequences, respectively. In addition, we identified 4912 non-redundant, Camellia sinensis intron length polymorphic (CsILP) markers, 85.8% of which were shared by both the CSS and CSA genomes. To validate, a subset of randomly chosen 10 CsMITE markers and 15 CsILP markers were tested and found to be polymorphic among the 36 highly diverse tea genotypes. These genome-wide markers, which were identified for the first time in tea plants, will be a valuable resource for genetic diversity analysis as well as marker-assisted breeding of tea genotypes for quality improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.