ArticleScientific reports2022
Profiling development of abdominal organs in the pig.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early gestation heat stress influences fetal biomarkers indicative of maternal cortisol transfer in pigs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Porcine myogenesis in cloned wildtype and MYF5/MYOD/MYF6-null porcine embryo.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Case Report: The effect of asplenia on the response to influenza vaccination and passive transfer of immunity in an adult female pig.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Large animal models in gynecology: status and future perspectives.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Review
- Exploring the Differential Expression of a Set of Key Genes Involved in the Regulation and Functioning of the Stomach in the Post-Weaned Pig.Veterinary sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The pig is an ideal model system for studying human development and disease due to its similarities to human anatomy, physiology, size, and genome. Further, advances in CRISPR gene editing have made genetically engineered pigs viable models for the study of human pathologies and congenital anomalies. However, a detailed atlas illustrating pig development is necessary for identifying and modeling developmental defects. Here we describe normal development of the pig abdominal system and show examples of congenital defects that can arise in CRISPR gene edited SAP130 mutant pigs. Normal pigs at different gestational ages from day 20 (D20) to term were examined and the configuration of the abdominal organs was studied using 3D histological reconstructions with episcopic confocal microscopy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and necropsy. This revealed prominent mesonephros, a transient embryonic organ present only during embryogenesis, at D20, while the developing metanephros that will form the permanent kidney are noted at D26. By D64 the mesonephroi are absent and only the metanephroi remain. The formation of the liver and pancreas was observed by D20 and complete by D30 and D35 respectively. The spleen and adrenal glands are first identified at D26 and completed by D42. The developing bowel and the gonads are identified at D20. The bowel appears completely rotated by D42, and testes in the male were descended at D64. This atlas and the methods used are excellent tools for identifying developmental pathologies of the abdominal organs in the pig at different stages of development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.