Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36171029›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Understanding of empathetic communication in acute hospital settings: a scoping review.

Jaquille Haribhai-Thompson, Karen McBride-Henry, Caz Hales, Helen Rook

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Jaquille Haribhai-ThompsonFaculty of Health, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-2944-345X
Karen McBride-HenryFaculty of Health, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4426-2574
Caz HalesFaculty of Health, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand Helen.rook@vuw.ac.nz caz.hales@vuw.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0002-3197-1657
Helen RookFaculty of Health, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand Helen.rook@vuw.ac.nz caz.hales@vuw.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0001-6040-0207
Victoria University of Wellington · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEmpathy and empathy education have been reviewed a number of times through systematic reviews and meta-analyses; however, the topic of 'empathetic communication' remains poorly understood when considering engaging in hospital-based research. Therefore, this scoping review aimed to explore the existing literature concerning empathetic communication in hospital settings and to evaluate the definitions presented.

designScoping review. DATA SOURCES: Systematic searches of the PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, PsycINFO, and PsycArticles databases were conducted. STUDY SELECTION: All English studies in which empathetic communication in hospital settings were explored. The search terms used included empathy, communication, hospital settings, providers, and consumers. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were assessed through the use of a pre-set analysis tool.

resultsAfter conducting the searches, 419 articles were identified, of which 26 were included in this review. No single article specifically defined the term 'empathetic communication'; however, 33 unique definitions of 'empathy' were identified, of which 23 considered communication to be a component of empathy. There was a considerable lack of consistency between the empathy definitions, with some classifying communication in empathy as an ability and others classifying it as a dynamic process.

conclusionFuture and contextually focused research is needed to develop a consistent and clear definition of empathetic communication and empathy within a hospital setting to better build positive healthcare cultures. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Inconsistencies between definitions of empathy in empathetic communication research could reduce the efficacy of future research gains and impact the translation of research findings into clinical practice.

Indexed as

CommunicationEmpathyDelivery of Health CareHospitalsHumanshealth services administration & managementmedical education & trainingquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID36171029
PMCPMC9528576
OpenAlexW4297535684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.