Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36171022›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Protocol for the implementation evaluation of an integrated paediatric and primary care model: Strengthening Care for Children (SC4C).

Michael Hodgins, Yvonne Zurynski, Jade Burley, Rachel Pelly, Peter D Hibbert, Susan Woolfenden, Jane Le, Stephanie Germano, Sonia Khano, Tammy Meyers Morris and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Michael HodginsPopulation Child Health Research Group, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9177-3428
Yvonne ZurynskiAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7744-8717
Jade BurleyFaculty of the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Rachel PellyHealth Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Peter D HibbertAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7865-343X
Susan WoolfendenPopulation Child Health Research Group, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jane LeHealth Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Stephanie GermanoNorth Western Melbourne Primary Health Network, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Sonia KhanoHealth Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Tammy Meyers MorrisPopulation Child Health Research Group, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Karen WheelerCentral and Eastern Sydney Primary Health Network, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Harriet HiscockHealth Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia r.lingam@unsw.edu.au harriet.hiscock@rch.org.au.ORCID 0000-0003-3017-2770
Raghu LingamPopulation Child Health Research Group, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia r.lingam@unsw.edu.au harriet.hiscock@rch.org.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionImplementation evaluations provide insight into how interventions are delivered across varying contexts and why interventions work in some contexts and not in others. This manuscript outlines a detailed protocol of an implementation evaluation embedded in a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial of a model of care, Strengthening Care for Children (SC4C), that integrates paediatric care in general practice. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe the pragmatic methods that will be used to capture implementation evaluation process and outcome data within this trial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Our implementation evaluation will use a mixed methods design, with data collected in the intervention arm of the SC4C trial guided by a logic model developed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Proctor and colleague's taxonomy of implementation outcomes. Data collection will be via questionnaires and semistructured interviews with general practitioners, paediatricians, general practice administrative staff and children and families. Each of the 21 general practices recruited into the study will be described in terms of staffing, patient throughput and location, in addition to the nuanced inner and outer contexts, use of the intervention and its acceptability. We will quantify implementation effectiveness in each general practice clinic using the CFIR validated scoring system. Importantly, we have embedded data collection post intervention to enable assessment of the sustainable adoption of the intervention. An inductive approach to the analysis of qualitative data will identify additional emerging themes that may not be covered by the formal frameworks underpinning our analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was granted by the Royal Children's Hospital Ethics Committee in August 2020 (HREC: 65955). Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry 12620001299998 on 1 December 2020.

Indexed as

General PracticeGeneral PractitionersChildHumansPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicPrimary Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesCommunity child healthPAEDIATRICSPRIMARY CARE

Identifiers

PMID36171022
PMCPMC9621160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.