Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36170841›Full record

ArticleCell reports2022

Motor cortical influence relies on task-specific activity covariation.

Claire L Warriner, Samaher Fageiry, Shreya Saxena, Rui M Costa, Andrew Miri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Motor cortex flexibly deploys a high-dimensional repertoire of subskills.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Cortical sculpting of a rhythmic motor program.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Preparatory activity and the expansive null-space.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Identifying Interpretable Latent Factors with Sparse Component Analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  19. An output-null signature of inertial load in motor cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Claire L WarrinerDepartment of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA; Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Samaher FageiryDepartment of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA; Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Shreya SaxenaDepartment of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA; Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA; Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA; Department of Statistics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA; Grossman Center for Statistics of the Mind, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Rui M CostaDepartment of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA; Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Andrew MiriDepartment of Neurobiology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA. Electronic address: andrewmiri@northwestern.edu.

Funding

Modeling multi-area dynamics during motor controlU19NS104649 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ABBOTT, LAURENCE F. · 2017 to 2021
$15.3M
Combining Physiological, Genetic, and Computational Approaches with Naturalistic Climbing Behavior to Elucidate the Functional Elements of Descending Motor ControlDP2NS120847 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI Joseph Andrew Miri · 2020 to 2026
$2.4M
NINDS NIH HHS DP2 NS120847NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS104649
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During limb movement, spinal circuits facilitate the alternating activation of antagonistic flexor and extensor muscles. Yet antagonist cocontraction is often required to stabilize joints, like when loads are handled. Previous results suggest that these different muscle activation patterns are mediated by separate flexion- and extension-related motor cortical output populations, while others suggest recruitment of task-specific populations. To distinguish between hypotheses, we developed a paradigm in which mice toggle between forelimb tasks requiring antagonist alternation or cocontraction and measured activity in motor cortical layer 5b. Our results conform to neither hypothesis: consistent flexion- and extension-related activity is not observed across tasks, and no task-specific populations are observed. Instead, activity covariation among motor cortical neurons dramatically changes between tasks, thereby altering the relation between neural and muscle activity. This is also observed specifically for corticospinal neurons. Collectively, our findings indicate that motor cortex drives different muscle activation patterns via task-specific activity covariation.

Indexed as

Motor CortexAnimalsElectromyographyForelimbMiceMotor NeuronsMovementMuscle, Skeletalalternationantagonist musclescaudal forelimb areacocontractionCP: NeuroscienceEMGmotor cortexmouseneural activityneural activity subspace

Identifiers

PMID36170841
PMCPMC9536049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.