Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36170524›Full record

ArticleBMJ leader2022

We need to work differently in a crisis: peer-professional leadership to redesign physicians' work.

Jaana Woiceshyn, Jo-Louise Huq, Sunand Kannappan, Gabriel Fabreau, Evan Minty, Sachin Pendharkar, Aleem Bharwani

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ leader, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jaana WoiceshynHaskayne School of Business, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada woiceshy@ucalgary.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-4547-7051
Jo-Louise HuqHaskayne School of Business, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Sunand KannappanCommunity Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Gabriel FabreauMedicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Evan MintyMedicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Sachin PendharkarMedicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Aleem BharwaniMedicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5981-3589
University of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding physician leadership is critical during pandemics and other health crises when formal organisational leaders may be unable to respond expeditiously. This study examined how physician leaders managed to quickly design a new model for acute-care physicians' work, adopted across four large hospitals in a public health authority in Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsThe research employed a qualitative case study methodology, with inductive analysis of interview transcripts and documents. Shortly after a physician work model redesign, we interviewed key informants: the physician leaders and others who participated in or supported the model's development. Participants were chosen based on their leadership role and through snowballing. All those who were approached agreed to participate.

resultsA process model describes leadership actions during four phases of work model development (priming, early planning, readying for operations and transition). These actions were: (1) recognising the threat, (2) committing to action, (3) forming and organising, (4) building and relying on relationships, (5) developing supporting processes and (6) designing functions and structure. We offer three additional contributions to knowledge about leadership in a time of crisis: (1) leveraging peer-professional leadership to initiate, formalise and organise change processes, (2) designing a new work model on existing and emerging evidence and (3) building and relying on relationships to unify various actors.

conclusionsThe model of peer-professional leadership can deepen understanding of how to lead professionals. Our findings could assist peer-professional and organisational leaders to encourage quick redesign of professionals' work in response to new phases of the COVID-19 pandemic or other crises.

Indexed as

COVID-19PhysiciansHumansLeadershipPandemicsQualitative ResearchCOVID-19doctorhealthcare planningmedical leadership

Identifiers

PMID36170524
PMCPMC12038107
OpenAlexW3190520184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.