ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2022
The Preferences of Transgender and Nonbinary People for Virtual Health Care After the COVID-19 Pandemic in Canada: Cross-sectional Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- 'It's less traumatic because you're in your own home': exploring trauma-informed care for digital sexual health services - a secondary qualitative data analysis.Sexually transmitted infections · 2026Article
- Worldwide prevalence of anxiety in transgender persons: Systematic review with meta-analysis.International journal of transgender health · 2026Review
- Four-year Experience of Videoconferencing-based Telepsychiatry Service in Patan Hospital: An Observational Study.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2025Observational
- Facilitators and barriers to using telemedicine for gender-affirming care in gender-diverse youth: A qualitative study.Journal of telemedicine and telecare · 2025Article
- Virtual Versus In-Person Intensive Outpatient Treatment for Eating Disorders During the COVID-19 Pandemic in United States-Based Treatment Facilities: Naturalistic Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Patients' and providers' evaluations of telepsychiatry and future directions: A literature review of mixed research methods.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence and social accountability in the Canadian health care landscape: A rapid literature review.PLOS digital health · 2024Review
- Patient portal interventions: a scoping review of functionality, automation used, and therapeutic elements of patient portal interventions.JAMIA open · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVirtual health care use has dramatically increased in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, raising the question of its potential role after the pandemic. For transgender (trans) and nonbinary (TNB) people, virtual care is promising because it may expand access to appropriate health care providers. However, emerging research indicates potential disparities in virtual care access related to sociodemographic, health, and social factors. There is a paucity of research on the factors affecting patient preferences for virtual versus in-person care, particularly in TNB communities.
objectiveThis study aimed to identify the sociodemographic, health, and social factors associated with postpandemic virtual care preferences in TNB communities.
methodsThe 2020 Trans PULSE Canada COVID survey examined the health, social, and economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic among 820 TNB participants who previously completed the prepandemic 2019 Trans PULSE Canada survey (n=2783). Data were weighted to the demographics of the 2019 sample. Chi-square tests were used to compare postpandemic preferences for virtual versus in-person care across sociodemographic, health, and social characteristics. Participants provided open-text responses explaining their preferences, which were used to contextualize quantitative findings.
resultsAmong 812 participants who indicated whether they would prefer virtual or in-person care after the pandemic, a weighted 32.7% (n=275) would prefer virtual care and 67.3% (n=537) would prefer in-person care. Preference for in-person over virtual care was associated with being in the 14-19 (49/56, weighted 85.0%), 50-64 (51/62, weighted 80.0%), and ≥65 (9/10, weighted 90.7%) age groups (χ
conclusionsTNB people may have differential interest in virtual care based on factors including age, chronic and mental health conditions, and gender-unsupportive home environments. Future research examining virtual care preferences would benefit from mixed methods intersectional approaches across these factors, to explore complexity in the barriers and facilitators of virtual care access and quality. These observed differences support flexibility with options to choose between in-person and virtual health care to meet TNB patients' specific health needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.