Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36170253›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Relationships among creativity indices: Creative potential, production, achievement, and beliefs about own creative personality.

Chiaki Ishiguro, Yuki Sato, Ai Takahashi, Yuko Abe, Etsuko Kato, Haruto Takagishi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chiaki IshiguroCollege of Informatics and Human Communication, Kanazawa Institute of Technology, Ishikawa, Japan.
Yuki SatoCollege of Liberal and Sciences, Tamagawa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Ai TakahashiCollege of Arts, Tamagawa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuko AbeCollege of Arts, Tamagawa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Etsuko KatoCollege of Arts, Tamagawa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Haruto TakagishiGraduate School of Brain Sciences, Tamagawa University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5143-9289

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although creativity has been measured in various ways (ideas, products, achievements, and personality), the relationships between these measurements remain unclear. The current study examines whether divergent thinking predicts creative behavior (i.e., creative production and achievement) and whether beliefs about own creative personality influences the link between divergent thinking and creative behavior. Eighty-eight undergraduate students were assessed via a divergent thinking test, a creative production test, and a creative achievement questionnaire. The results showed that divergent thinking was positively associated with both creative behaviors (i.e., creative production in fine arts and achievement). In addition, beliefs about own creative personality moderated the relationship between divergent thinking and creative achievements, in that this relationship was stronger when Creative Personality Scale scores were higher. The current findings suggest some associations among creativity indices: divergent thinking promotes creative achievements, and this relation is moderated by beliefs about own creative personality. Further investigation is required to specify the causal relationships among creativity indices.

Indexed as

CreativitySelf-AssessmentAchievementHumansPersonalityThinking

Identifiers

PMID36170253
PMCPMC9518913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.