Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36170227›Full record

ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2022

Cancer Inhibition and In Vivo Osteointegration and Compatibility of Gallium-Doped Bioactive Glasses for Osteosarcoma Applications.

Lucas Souza, Filipe V Ferreira, Joao H Lopes, Jose Angelo Camilli, Richard A Martin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Targeting Bone Tumours with 45S5 Bioactive Glass.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lucas SouzaEngineering for Heath Research Centre, College of Engineering & Physical Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0188-5168
Filipe V FerreiraEmbrapa Instrumentation, Nanotechnology National Laboratory for Agriculture, XV de Novembro, 1452, Sao Carlos 13560-970, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8494-1868
Joao H LopesDepartment of Chemistry, Aeronautics Institute of Technology, Praça Marechal Eduardo Gomes 50, Vila das Acacias, São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12228-900, Brazil.
Jose Angelo CamilliDepartment of Functional and Structural Biology, State University of Campinas, Campinas13083-970, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Richard A MartinEngineering for Heath Research Centre, College of Engineering & Physical Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6013-2334
Aston University · GBBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRInstituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional osteosarcoma therapies tend to focus solely on eradicating residual cancer cells and often fail to promote local bone regeneration and even inhibit it due to lack of precise control over target cells, i.e., the treatment affects both normal and cancer cells. Typically, multistep procedures are required for optimal efficacy. Here, we found that a silica-based bioactive material containing 3 mol % gallium oxide selectively kills human osteosarcoma cells and presents excellent in vivo osteointegration, while showing no local or systemic toxicity. Cell culture media conditioned with the proposed material was able to kill 41% of osteosarcoma cells, and no significant deleterious effect on normal human osteoblasts was observed. In addition, rats treated with the gallium-doped material showed excellent material-bone integration with no sign of local toxicity or implant rejection. Systemic biocompatibility investigation did not indicate any sign of toxicity, with no presence of fibrosis or cellular infiltrate in the histological microstructure of the liver and kidneys after 56 days of observation. Taken together, these results show that synergistic bone regeneration and targeted cancer therapy can be combined, paving the way toward new bone cancer treatment approaches.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsGalliumOsteosarcomaAnimalsGlassHumansRatsSilicon DioxideGalliumSilicon Dioxidebiocompatibilitybioglassbone cancergalliumin vitro toxicityin vivo regeneration

Identifiers

PMID36170227
PMCPMC9562271
OpenAlexW4297460874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.