Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36170225›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2022

Models of comprehensive care for older persons with chronic diseases: a systematic review with a focus on effectiveness.

Leticia A Barajas-Nava, Juan Garduño-Espinosa, Juan M Mireles Dorantes, Raúl Medina-Campos, M Carmen García-Peña

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Leticia A Barajas-NavaEvidence-Based Medicine Research Unit, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez (HIMFG), National Health Institute, México City, México Leticiaa.barajas@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3040-7560
Juan Garduño-EspinosaHead of the Research Office, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez (HIMFG), National Health Institute, México City, México.ORCID 0000-0002-3000-4948
Juan M Mireles DorantesHigh School of Medicine, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México City, México.
Raúl Medina-CamposDeputy Research Director, Instituto Nacional de Geriatría, México City, México.
M Carmen García-PeñaHead of the Research Office, Instituto Nacional de Geriatría, México City, México.ORCID 0000-0002-9380-6964
Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez · MXInstituto Nacional de Pediatria · MXInstituto Politécnico Nacional · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAgeing entails a variety of physiological changes that increase the risk of chronic non-communicable diseases. The prevalence of these diseases leads to an increase in the use of health services. The care models implemented by health systems should provide comprehensive long-term healthcare. We conducted this systematic review to determine whether any model of care for older persons have proven to be effective.

methodsA systematic review of literature was carried out to identify randomised clinical trials that have assessed how effective a care model for older patients with chronic diseases. A searches electronic databases such as MEDLINE, Turning Research Into Practice Database, Cochrane Library and Cochrane Central Register of controlled Trials was conducted from January 1966 to January 2021. Two independent reviewers assessed the eligibility of the studies. Interventions were identified and classified according to the taxonomies developed by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care and Cochrane Consumers and Communication groups.

resultsOf the 4952 bibliographic references that were screened, 577 were potentially eligible and the final sample included 25 studies that evaluated healthcare models in older people with chronic diseases. In the 25 care models, the most frequently implemented interventions were educational, and those based on the provision of healthcare. Only 22% of the outcomes of interventions were identified as being effective, whereas 21% were identified as being partially effective; thus, more than 50% of the outcomes were identified as being ineffective.

conclusionsIt was not possible to determine a care model as effective. The interventions implemented in the models are variable. The most effective outcomes were focused on improving the patient-healthcare professional relationship in the early stages of the intervention. The interventions addressed in the studies were similar to public health interventions as their main objectives focused on promoting health. Most studies were of low methodological quality.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseComprehensive Health CareModels, OrganizationalAgedHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcomegeriatric medicineinternational health servicesorganisation of health servicesprimary carepublic health

Identifiers

PMID36170225
PMCPMC9362834
OpenAlexW4293236133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.