ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2022
Etiology of Macular Edema Defined by Deep Learning in Optical Coherence Tomography Scans.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vitreoretinal disease detection using artificial intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International ophthalmology · 2026Pooled it
- Differences in Artificial Intelligence-Based Macular Fluid Parameters Between Clinical Stages of Diabetic Macular Edema and Their Relationship with Visual Acuity.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Enhancing AI reliability: A foundation model with uncertainty estimation for optical coherence tomography-based retinal disease diagnosis.Cell reports. Medicine · 2025Article
- Bibliometric analysis of research on the application of deep learning to ophthalmology.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Advances in ocular aging: combining deep learning, imaging, and liquid biopsy biomarkers.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- A new texture-based labeling framework for hyper-reflective foci identification in retinal optical coherence tomography images.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Application and progress of artificial intelligence technology in the segmentation of hyperreflective foci in OCT images for ophthalmic disease research.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence for diabetic retinopathy in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2023Article
- Retinal Hydration Assessment With Optical Coherence Tomography: Unraveling Its Significance in Retinal Fluid Dynamics, Macular Edema and Cell Viability.Translational vision science & technology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To develop an automated method based on deep learning (DL) to classify macular edema (ME) from the evaluation of optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans. Methods: A total of 4230 images were obtained from data repositories of patients attended in an ophthalmology clinic in Colombia and two free open-access databases. They were annotated with four biomarkers (BMs) as intraretinal fluid, subretinal fluid, hyperreflective foci/tissue, and drusen. Then the scans were labeled as control or ocular disease among diabetic macular edema (DME), neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), and retinal vein occlusion (RVO) by two expert ophthalmologists. Our method was developed by following four consecutive phases: segmentation of BMs, the combination of BMs, feature extraction with convolutional neural networks to achieve binary classification for each disease, and, finally, multiclass classification of diseases and control images. Results: The accuracy of our model for nAMD was 97%, and for DME, RVO, and control were 94%, 93%, and 93%, respectively. Area under curve values were 0.99, 0.98, 0.96, and 0.97, respectively. The mean Cohen's kappa coefficient for the multiclass classification task was 0.84. Conclusions: The proposed DL model may identify OCT scans as normal and ME. In addition, it may classify its cause among three major exudative retinal diseases with high accuracy and reliability. Translational Relevance: Our DL approach can optimize the efficiency and timeliness of appropriate etiological diagnosis of ME, thus improving patient access and clinical decision making. It could be useful in places with a shortage of specialists and for readers that evaluate OCT scans remotely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.