Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36169931›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine2022

Effectiveness of muscle energy technique in patients with nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Gabriela K Santos, Raphael Gonçalves de Oliveira, Laís Campos de Oliveira, Carolina Ferreira C de Oliveira, Rodrigo A Andraus, Suzy Ngomo, Andrea Fusco, Cristina Cortis, Rubens A DA Silva

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06748859 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Iliopsoas Strain-counterstrain Technique on Mechanical Chronic Low Back Pain and Lumbar Flexion Restriction

TypeinterventionalSponsorMarmara UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled36ConditionsMechanical Low Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)ArmsCounterstrain technique, Exercise therapy
NCT07370272 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Lumbopelvic Cognitive Movement Control Training Versus Core Stability Exercises in Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled36ConditionsSacroiliac Joint PainArmsThe conventional Physiotherpay Program (US & MET), Core Stability Exercises (CSE), Lumbopelvic cognitive movement control training (CMCT)
NCT07426627 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Effect of Muscle Energy Technique and Kinesiotherapy on Pain,ROM and Functional Disability on Non Specific Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled64ConditionsNon Specific Low Back PainArmsStandard Physical therapy, Muscle energy technique, Kinesiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Potential novel therapeutic strategies for neuropathic pain.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Gabriela K SantosDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences UEL/UNOPAR, LAFUP-UNOPAR-Universidade Pitagoras UNOPAR, Londrina, Brazil.
Raphael Gonçalves de OliveiraHealth Sciences Center, Universidade Estadual do Norte do Paraná (UENP), Jacarezinho, Brazil.
Laís Campos de OliveiraHealth Sciences Center, Universidade Estadual do Norte do Paraná (UENP), Jacarezinho, Brazil.
Carolina Ferreira C de OliveiraHealth Sciences Center, Universidade Estadual do Norte do Paraná (UENP), Jacarezinho, Brazil.
Rodrigo A AndrausDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences UEL/UNOPAR, LAFUP-UNOPAR-Universidade Pitagoras UNOPAR, Londrina, Brazil.
Suzy NgomoDepartment of Public Health, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (UQAC), Centre intersectoriel en santé durable, Lab BioNR et Cupht - UQAC, Saguenay, Canada.
Andrea FuscoDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Lazio Meridionale, Cassino, Frosinone, Italy.
Cristina CortisDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Lazio Meridionale, Cassino, Frosinone, Italy.
Rubens A DA SilvaDepartment of Public Health, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (UQAC), Centre intersectoriel en santé durable, Lab BioNR et Cupht - UQAC, Saguenay, Canada - rubens.dasilva@uqac.ca.
Universidade Estadual do Norte do Paraná · BRUniversidade Norte do Paraná · BRUniversità degli studi di Cassino e del Lazio Meridionale · ITCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean · CAUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLow back pain (LBP) is a major cause of physical disability in the world. The origin of this condition can be due to differents causes, with a specific cause or of unknown mechanical origin,being characterized as unspecific. In this case a physical therapy treatment approach with manual therapy is relevant, which includes the muscle energy technique (MET) classified as a common conservative treatment for pathologies of the spine, mainly in LBP and disability. This study assessed the effectiveness of the muscle energy technique on nonspecific low back pain. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Patients with acute, subacute or chronic non-specific low back pain. The primary outcomes were pain and disability. This study was designed by a systematic review and meta-analysis, registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020219295). For the report and methodological definitions of this study, the recommendations of the PRISMA protocol and the Cochrane collaboration, were followed, respectively. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The search yielded 164 citations, which 19 were eligible randomised trials were included in the review (N.=609 patients with low back pain). The methodological quality of the studies averaged 4.2 points, with an interval of 2 to 7 points. Three RCTs showed satisfactory methodological quality (PEDro Score ≥6). For patients with chronic LBP, a significant result on pain (but with a small and clinically unimportant effect) in favor of MET versus other (MD=-0.51 [95% CI,-0.93 to -0.09] P=0.02, N.=376, studies=11, I2=80%). In patients with subacute LBP, MET enabled a significant and moderate effect to reduce pain intensity when compared to the control group (MD=-1.32 [95% CI,-2.57 to -0.06] P=0.04, N.=120, studies=3, I

conclusionsMET is not considered an efficient treatment to improve the incapacity of the lumbar spine, but it may be beneficial in reducing the intensity of LBP, although showing a small clinical effect in chronic LBP and a moderate effect in subacute LBP.

Indexed as

Chronic PainLow Back PainMusculoskeletal ManipulationsExercise TherapyHumansMuscles

Identifiers

PMID36169931
PMCPMC10081535
OpenAlexW4297462893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.